9/11: Tower Gold Vault Emptied Prior To Attack

A FEMA investigator made the shocking claim concerning the 9/11 attacks, “Vault contents emptied before attack… they knew it was going to happen”

Kurt Sonnenfeld was working for the US Federal Emergency Management Agency, an organisation tied to the US Department of Homeland Security, when the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center took place.

After the planes crashed into the building, Kurt was given unrestricted access to ground zero – the site where the buildings once stood.

He shot hours of footage but never handed it in.

Of particular interest was what he found beneath World Trade Center 6.

He says inside the building he came across a vault that had been cleared of its contents before the planes struck.

In a documentary filmed in Argentina, Kurt said the discovery is proof that America knew the attacks were coming, at the very least.

It is of note to mention that Sonnenfeld’s wife died under mysterious circumstances shortly after he carried out his investigation. The cause of death? A bullet to the back of the head.

Sonnenfeld was charged with the murder but those charges were eventually dropped, at which point he fled to Argentina. He has since remarried and had two children.

The U.S. Department of Justice is now attempting to extradite Sonnenfeld back to the United States where he is once again being charged with his wife’s murder.

But Sonnenfeld says that the reasons behind the U.S. government’s push to bring him back to America are more nefarious than they are letting on, alluding to his intimate knowledge of the 9-11 Ground Zero crime scene as a potential reason for taking him into custody.

Kurt Sonnenfeld is accused of murdering his wife and claims 9/11 was an inside job — and Argentina won’t give him up 

We know for a fact that gold was being stored under Trade Center 4. Perhaps similar riches were being stored under WTC 6.

That the vault was completely empty when Sonnenfeld carried out his investigation certainly suggests foreknowledge by highly placed insiders.

Advertisements

Cultural Marxism Explained

The concept of ‘cultural Marxism‘ is a persistent and important term in the world of political activism. It is a term of the utmost pertinence in understanding the globalist spurred motives for the engineered happenings of the past, present, and future. It represents an ideology that seeks to impose a uniformity of thought and behaviour, and is therefore totalitarian in nature.

“A worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries (the elite).” — Georg Lukacs, Marxist philosopher

If we break it down, the term denotes the gradual denigration and neutralisation of Western ideals through the application of ‘critical theory’ this is essentially destructive criticism of the main elements of Western culture, including Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, hierarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention and conservatism.

At its core, this is a satanic agenda in disguise. It only takes a quick look into Biblical history to see that Cain, the smith, embodies the socialist-communist icon. Karl Marx was inspired by darkness, as detailed in ‘Marx and Satan’ by Richard Wurmbrand.

“Bilderberg pulls the strings of every government and intelligence agency in the Western world.”James Morcan, The Ninth Orphan

The reality will be enslavement, a state of absolute control over the domain of the human body; which is the ‘last frontier’ of autocratic self-determination. It will be a world without the liberties we enjoy today. A climate without the freedoms and natural rights we are presently accustomed to — and take for granted.

“Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt.”Samuel Adams, Essay in the Public Advertiser, 1749

Our Gods will be our overlords (government, from govern: control, and ment: mind), our indoctrinated customs and values will rally under their dominion, our very existence spent in a state of perpetual serfdom and servitude, we will give up our liberty for security and find ourselves chained in a cell.

“The very definition of tyranny is when all powers are gathered under one place.”James Madison, The Federalist No. 47

It only takes a glance at the godless, communist stronghold, North Korea, to see this system in action. It will be a state of suppressed consciousness, no volume of media shall dissent their supreme narrative, no inkling of doubt shall sway their absolutism. We will be programmed to adore it, and the great teachings of old will be ashes lost in the wind, their peculiar brand of ‘progress’ is the free man’s nightmare.

north_korean_leade_3594272b
Dictator Kim Jong Un addresses his footmen.

Cultural Marxism is fundamentally a socialist idea, it shifts what empowers the people to the state level and calls it equality, but in practise it has only ever failed miserably. The natural state of the world is inequality. It is a vain effort to concentrate the burden of inequality in the hands of a few, as this does not escape the self-evident corruptibility of our human condition, we will always be liable to corruption, so why try to fix our imperfections with more imperfection?

The Marxist idea is flawed because of this, it seeks to replace individual morality by addressing morality and justice through state intervention, the truth is these things will never be fixed; it must be left between the deep consultation of the individual and a Bible.

Free will cannot be tamed.

Our free-will means both good and bad, Marxism cannot seem to accept this, so it attempts to tear down what makes us human in order to ‘fix’ us. The truth is, we fix ourselves under the scriptures, self-discipline and following the long-held values we see in Western society; which is largely based on biblical scriptures. Even then, there will still be those who choose to sin.

Socialism is destructive, Capitalism is progressive.

“Socialism is not in the least what is pretends to be. It is not the pioneer of a better and finer world, but the spoiler of what thousands of years of civilisation have created. It does not build, it destroys. For destruction is the essence of it. It produces nothing, it only consumes what the social order based on private ownership in the means of production has created . . . Each step leading towards Socialism must exhaust itself in the destruction of what already exists.” — Ludvig Von Mises, Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis

More commonly it is known as “multiculturalism”, ‘globalisation’ or, less formally, ‘political correctness’. From its beginning, the promoters of cultural Marxism have known they could be more effective if they concealed the Marxist nature of their work, hence the use of terms such as “multiculturalism.” These deceptive monikers mask the ideological root, and have served to dissuade criticism, and show the face of ‘multiculturalism’ as a progressive, virtuous effort. It is quite the contrary.

Churchill addressed the socialist issue astutely, the equal sharing of miseries;

“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.”Winston Churchill

Cultural Marxism/Socialism has an end goal, destroying Western culture and Biblical faith, the value system that upholds individual liberty, and prevents tyranny from taking hold.

race-nation

“If you want total security, go to prison. There you’re fed, clothed, given medical care and so on. The only thing lacking… is freedom.”Dwight D. Eisenhower

Ancient roots of socialism.

This pursuit for global governance has been evident since the first stirrings of human civilisation, as noted by scriptures in the Babylonian efforts to build a great tower to the heavens, the iconic tower of Babel.

By placing the Tower of Babel incident just prior to the stories of Abram and his descendants, the biblical writer is suggesting, in the first place, that post-flood humanity is as wicked as pre-flood humanity. Rather than sending something as devastating as a flood to annihilate mankind, however, God now places His hope in a covenant with Abraham as a powerful solution to humanity’s sinfulness. This tells us that force from a higher power (Communism-Socialism) will never save mankind, but mankind must save itself on an individual basis, through the Holy covenant.

This leads right into the Tower of Babel account in 11:1-9. In 11:1, Moses writes, “Now the whole earth used the same language and the same words.” After the flood, the whole earth spoke the same language. But man’s habitual sin brought about the language barrier.

In 11:2, we read these fateful words: “It came about as they journeyed east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there.” The word “east” is intentionally alluded to in the Scriptures, to let us know that a person or group is moving contrary to God’s will. In the Genesis narratives, when man goes “east,” he leaves the land of blessing (Eden and the Promised Land) and goes to a land where the greatest of his hopes will turn to ruin (Babylon and Sodom).19

  • A classical Freemason term of acknowledgement is “I’m travelling in the East“. The East symbolises where the sun rises, and is the icon of rebellion against God.

Please also notice that they “settled” in Shinar. In 9:1, God clearly commanded Noah and his sons to “be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth” (cf. 8:17). There is no reason to suspect that Noah’s descendants did not understand what God wanted. God wanted them to move throughout all the earth but they banded together in order to defy God’s command. They selected the best land that they could find; they staked their claim in the land of Shinar, a place that becomes associated with evil.

They said, ‘Come, let us build for ourselves a city, and a tower whose top will reach into heaven, and let us make for ourselves a name, otherwise we will be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth.’” The motivation for building a city was to make the builders a name (cf. Ps 14:1). The object of this endeavor was to establish a center by which they might maintain their unity.21 Now God desired unity for humankind, but one that He created, not one founded on a social state. They wanted to “empower” themselves. Both motive and object were ungodly. God had instructed man to fill the earth (1:28), to spread over the whole planet. The builders of the “tower” seem to have intended that it serve as a memorial or landmark among other things.

Socialism attempts to fix humankind with more humankind.

What we have learned here is that looking to society (people)/socialism for the big answers, and not God, is undoubtedly a big mistake. Looking towards self-determination without the values posed by God will bring only chaos, ruin, and anguish. Capitalism leaves us to choose our path relative to the natural laws posed by the Bible, our government fully representative of us, and we representative of our government — socialist governments seldom represent the average man.

“Socialists cry “Power to the people”, and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean – power over people, power to the State.” — Margaret Thatcher, speech to Conservative Central Council, March 15, 1986

Socialism/communism (Without religion) puts the authority in the hands of the few people that rule. When will we accept that the human condition is terribly flawed? Human masters are still human, imperfect, and liable to exude these imperfections as we all do, hence the classical term; ‘human error’. We can’t escape that, not even in Marx’s Utopian vision.

The truth is that all of the divisions of the whole world are a result of sin and the righteous judgement of God. Socialism aims to fix this by introducing an eternally ongoing political campaign to pretend that we, as humans, can ever hope to fix sin as a community; it’s simply empty platitude, and a poor disguise to try and make the Bible seem redundant.

Mikhail Bakunin, the infamous Russian anarchist and for a while co-warrior of Marx: “The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority, revolt in which we see the fecund germ of all human emancipations, the revolution. Socialists recognise each other by the words, ‘In the name of the one to whom a great wrong has been done.’” (He is speaking of Satan)


Are the Jews to blame?

Is the Globalist push for a NWO/Marxist-Socialist word order a Jewish plan? No.

Judaism is the true faith, by assuming the identity of Judaism the culprits are able to be hidden in plain sight.

By getting theorists and activists to turn against, and lambaste Judaism, they win in suppressing the Biblical values and practices that are their undoing.

As for Christianity, it is partially true, but overall it is false. ‘Churchianity’ as coined by Michael Rood, is at its roots, a misleading, pagan-influenced cult order that links to sun worship; one of the many names for Satanism. It outright ignores vast amounts of scripture, and does not teach the true practices of the Torah, it is more a weak gesture than a true practice of faith.

In the case of Catholicism, the Papal system is heavily imbued in Satanic practices, Christianity is an imitation of Judaism founded during the Council of Nicaea to conflate pagan deities with Jewish scriptures for the sake of collectivist religion, this made ruling easier for the Roman empire.

All in all, for the hope that we seek, the unity which man cannot find on his own, will only be revealed when we get to God’s covenant promises made to Abram.

I will end on this powerful quote by a former Marxist advocate;

“I remained a socialist for several years, even after my rejection of Marxism; and if there could be such a thing as socialism combined with individual liberty, I would be a socialist still. For nothing could be better than living a modest, simple, and free life in an egalitarian society. It took some time before I recognized this as no more than a beautiful dream; that freedom is more important than equality; that the attempt to realize equality endangers freedom; and that, if freedom is lost, there will not even be equality among the unfree.” — Karl R. Popper, Unended Quest

 

Debt Slavery

The monetary system in place enslaves us. It manipulates prices, inflates, contorts, contrives; it creates the illusion of sparsity where there is abundance, bottlenecks fruitfulness and pushes upon us austerity without due cause, except the elitist notion that a proletariat populace can be controlled.

Globalist Economics

This monetary system is based on fractional reserve currency, it is based on creating money where there is none, a constantly raised debt-ceiling that cannot ever be paid back. The passive populace consents to this, materialistic complacency satisfies the suppressed average man, we think our basic needs are enough, we are told we live in the lap of luxury; that we should not dare look beyond our white picket fences, to not think outside the box that is played to us on repeat.

Manufactured consent through heavy indoctrination allows the big government to play God, while we aimlessly wallow in our material possessions, submissive, dumb, valueless, and utterly swindled.

The artificial debt bubble is ever-growing, upheld by a dependency on the US petrodollar via the 1944 Bretton Woods Conference, which firmly established the U.S. Dollar as the global reserve currency, after the  1971 Nixon Shock when the United States abandoned the international gold standard. This arrogant, superlative status as reserve currency is enforced by a US-NATO combined military unimaginably powerful (Budget of around USD 600 billion). This is all reinforced through the back-channels of sanctions and deals that pull the global strings. However, the controllers know this debt bubble will have to burst eventually, as a boom-bust system must be fulfilled, unless…

“The collapse of the petrodollar system, which I believe will occur sometime within this decade, will make the 1971 Nixon Shock look like a dress rehearsal.” — Jerry Robinson @FTMDaily

According to radio show host and political activist, Bill Cooper, in order to avoid a complete financial collapse that would end the possibility of world government, they must bring about cashless currency, a single, centralised point of monetary control. Either that, or initiate a cataclysmic world war to mask the collapse.

This cashless system will prevent or mask the system from collapsing, this is because digits typed onto a screen constitutes the ultimate form of money-manipulation. This is because it shifts from the untraceable status of hard, cold cash to something completely controllable.

cashless-society-rfid-chip

To reach this point, they must masterfully manufacture consent, they seek to wage this war on the people without firing a single bullet. According to Bill Cooper, they work in the shadows devising plans decades in advance, so to always be many steps ahead of the people they seek to deceive.

Manufactured Consent:

In order to get their own way, the Globalist elite must eradicate the sacrosanct, foundation-stone, unalienable rights and values held by the majority of people in the West. Once constitutionalism is broken, the ability for the globalists to do what they want will be a reality.

The U.S. Constitution, an inherently libertarian doctrine, details natural law as sovereign, this is the law of God, Biblical scripture is at its very basis, proposing that the rulers of man are subject to the laws of God, i.e. the right to bear arms.

These values are held relatively strongly in the West, which is arguably the last bastion of constitutional freedom and liberty – in order for the Socialist-Marxist Globalists to overturn this, they must gradually and tactfully employ numerous, underhanded methods, including;

  • Mass-importation, integration, and acceptance of people that have never known liberty, and thus will not defend said liberty/constitutional values. This is being actively seen with the current migrant crisis in Europe, an effort by cultural Marxists to eradicate Western values and lower the bar enough for them to seize control over the world’s sovereign nations, this is because these people will vote for socialist-establishment candidates and work for next to nothing, pushing down wage standards, living standards and also the standards of everything else, including the standards the people hold the governing body accountable to. With western men feminised (read on for more), the still-masculine third world people will quickly out-breed the remaining bloodlines that still hold onto constitutional values, cultural and social replacement in action.
  • Cultural engineering to uplift anti-liberty trends and customs as popular, the use of all levels of media production to push the agenda of socialist-Marxist Globalism is rife, and used to inculcate and indoctrinate people to lean towards socialist-Marxist policies, these are policies that whittle away national sovereignty and encourage passiveness, servitude and apathy.
  • Pushing for race division to portray ‘whiteness’ (liberty) as regressive and oppressive, this silences the dissenting voices from the predominantly white demographic, an ethnic group that on the whole, holds the most progressive values. If you shut down the native holders of constitutional values into a corner while piling in millions of regressive, third-world Islamic people, you can culturally overwrite & thus destroy the values, history and status (success/opulence) that ‘whiteness’ (which is really just the success of good values, race has nothing to do with it) has historically exuded and sought to share with everybody else. You’ll notice bans on confederate flags, a section of white culture branded as ‘racist’ yet the truth is that all cultures have had turbulent pasts, the socialist-Marxist objective is to target and eradicate cultures with Biblical and constitutional adherence.
  • Pushing an ostensibly ‘innocent’ and virtuous looking brand of politics that underhandedly brings socialistic, soft-imperialist politics to the forefront. The sheer lack of transparency in politics today is signified by the example of the idea that the EU will benefit the constituents ostensibly, the case is actually the opposite, member states are forced to cede their sovereign control, resources and influence to the Brussels-ruled bloc. The result is a socialist-inclined superstate ruled by the unelected few. A smaller version of what world government will eventually look like.
  • Acceptance of women as dominant, and men as submissive, in a charade that is marketed to appear progressive and liberal, the globalist efforts to ‘break the stereotypes’ of women as the submissive sex/vice versa for men, is undoubtedly a charlatan effort to undermine the sacred masculine energy (action and pursuit), an energy that threatens the globalist plans to seize control over the world. Remove the rebellious man from the equation, and you can take/do anything you want. The spreading of harmful chemicals through food/water influences bodily chemistry to turn men and women gay, in order to mask this noticeable change the Globalists have launched pro-gay campaigns to make it look like this mass ‘coming-out’ is due to a social movement, and not their sly chemical warfare. Popular culture also leans towards this contrived notion, the new starwars portrays Rey as a ‘strong female’ lead, there is even a scene where she openly rejects a male characters’ chivalrous advance.
  • Overturning the distinction of gender, in order to oust the secure concept of a masculine sex and a feminine sex, which something essential to a stable, natural world, the globalists have pushed a widespread campaign of LGBT. They seek to reinforce a broad, obscure spectrum of gender rather than the idea of two clear-cut genders. This will ruin the family structure, which is something that will damage a child’s biological development, without a clear mother/father the child will biologically turn to the state for parenting, in an appeal for a stronger role model. If you can make something as absolute as gender transient and vague, then you can overturn something as absolute as the constitution.
  • Feminising everything to overload the world with feminine energy. If this is achieved, people will be more inclined to emotional decision-making (feminine trait) rather than logical decision-making (a masculine trait). If people become too caring and non-pragmatic, the inclination is to vote socialist. It is asserted by Stefan Molyneux that women lean towards socialist politics. This is simply because they are naturally drawn to a figure that provides for them, in this case the government. Women love safety nets, it is a biological default, a predilection for security in the upbringing of a prospective child, when you overtly emphasise femininity, you very quickly get socialist politics to emerge.
  • Pushing a culture of giving in to temptation and our animal impulses. To concede to your animal nature is to give up on higher consciousness, and as a result become little more than an animal to be herded, regulated and controlled. Rudimentary impulses are predictable and easy to manipulate, for example, with the animal reaction of fear; the ‘fight and flight‘ reaction was utilised in the 9/11 event, a staged terrorist attack that rallied public support behind the consecutive wars in the middle-east. When your reptilian brain is constantly activated (the constant sensationalism of the mainstream media keeps our fear consistently piqued) we are in a state of low-functioning, panicked, reactionary decision-making, it suppresses our capacity for original, critical thought and favours the survival instinct, an instinct that overrides our ability to process the situation accurately, we naturally lash out in fear without really understanding the situation. This case of human nature is being constantly used against us, to great effect for the globalists.
  • An obsession with racial classification, the mainstream media’s obsession with classifying race is repugnant, constantly portraying blacks as underdogs being persecuted by whites (yet black-on-black crime is the real oppressor), having an obsession with racism and not ‘offending’ somebody else’s cultural roots, even if their culture is by fact, morally inferior. This media narrative favours and protects decadent cultures, it classifies and divides while spitting on ‘white’ western culture by cherry-picking, and magnifying eras of oppression, and ignoring the great advantages of constitutionalism. Simply by repeatedly outlining racial differences, the media fuels racial tension, a classic divide & conquer scheme.