Proof: Low-level IQ Means Low-level Civilization

People with an IQ (intelligence quotient) under 83 are useless in a modern technological society. That statement makes 100% common sense, but I have to keep saying it in this day and age of double-think; that real, quantifiable (not perceived) inequalities between humans actually exist, and need to be seriously considered and tackled.

Scaling above an IQ of 83 (83-90) you have barely competent, but lacking in independent critical & creative thought.

At around 100 points things change; critical thought and creative ability emerges, it is dulled, but crucially, it is present.

100 is where Anglo society currently sits, the string-pullers want to drop this statistic by about 10 IQ points through mass immigration, reducing the white birthrate, and encouraging miscegenation — they’ll push any social engineering campaign at their disposal to smooth-over the transition period, instill guilt in the naysayers, and foment conflict in the ranks of the unyielding conservatives.

Their goal is to get a mainly migrant population; unintelligent, prone to inbreeding, and religiously obsessed — this new population will work for less, question less, and, perhaps most importantly, will not identify with the once Western “nations” they inhabit.

They will be their own prison; displaced and rootless, they will take on the new identity of the nationless and the borderless, it will seem such a grand Utopian idea to them. They will become a willing and subservient extension of any system that will satisfy their basic needs and desires — they will take the bait of big government at every hurdle and then thank them for it.

With the prongs of propaganda they will come to see the white man and his ways as their oppressor and enemy and will hold true to their old ways, complacent in their own separate society and language, told that they are acceptable as they are, rewarded for being substandard, rewarded for being perfect slaves, an overarching liberal “social justice” culture will be designed to equalize and exalt them and all their flaws above the established civilization.

Within a matter of decades, left to mix and truly lose their national roots, these migrants will vote for and back the power of a European superstate that will legislate unaccountably and perpetuate their suffering, winning their votes by claiming to “represent” them, by openly putting down the Western man who “oppresses” them — the divide and conquer strategy.

The voice of the native Western man will be rapidly drowned out as the ever-growing unintelligent, rootless, and shiftless mob will rule supreme in a democratic system that the globalist kingpins will have masterfully rigged to their total advantage.

The white man, his culture and his identity will be painted as oppressive, racist, and repugnant in every regard — while the culture, identity, and traditions of the new population will be painted in a positive light in every regard; made to appear superior to the Western society that they flee to for a better life; their crimes ignored, their shortfalls glossed-over, with liberal apologists abound in defense of third world culture’s “compatibility” with the West, the white man will be blamed for their crimes and incompetence, attributed as a figment of white oppression. These outrageous lies will be spread far and wide.

Within the puppet-aristocracy, they award themselves prizes for their acts of “social progression” through the award of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize, or the Charlemagne Prize; a prize awarded for work done in the service of “European unification”, this year EU lapdog Emmanuel Macron won the prize, previous recipients include EU bureaucrats such as Jean-Claude Juncker (2006), and Donald Tusk (2010), the pro-migration politician Angela Merkel (2008) with the EU pioneer Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi himself earning the first ever issuance of the award in 1950.

The epi-genetic and genetic plan for population control.

The Kalergi plan outlines the plan to form “a new mixed breed population” in Europe, made up of an average IQ of about 90. Competent enough to do basic or intermediate level work, but too incompetent to question the bigger picture.

Respected clinical psychologist, Jordan Peterson, lays out the science — without basic intelligence, a worker’s competency cannot be “learned”, as some claim — such incompetence, Peterson argues, is biologically innate.

The idea that anyone can “achieve their dreams” is patently false. The idea of individual self-determinism is hampered by the genetic ceiling that absolutely exists in varying degrees across groups of humans — cultural-Marxism in the education system will teach us the Martin Luther King idea that one IQ level is equal to another, that race is just “skin deep”, the uncomfortable truth is that Mr. King got it wrong, and that is precisely why he is glorified.

Peterson spoke of how the US army was motivated to find an accurate predictor of human intelligence as a means of effectively organizing and delegating human resources — from this emerged the development of the entirely reliable & indiscriminate IQ test.

“You can’t induct anyone into the US armed forces if they have an IQ of less than 83.”

At around an IQ of 83 — in the US army it is regarded that you can have no helpful role in the organisation. Muslim countries have an average IQ of just 81, 7.5 points lower than non-Muslim countries, most of the migration to Europe is from Muslim countries, we are bringing in loads of people who, according to Peterson’s analysis, cannot function in our society — isn’t that worth talking about?

Furthermore, half of all Muslims are inbred and 55% of Pakistanis in the UK are married to their cousins. What does this mean for the UK’s genetic future? It can’t mean much good if Muslim migrants are set to become the dominant demographic in a matter of decades.

Another effect is in-group preference, a scientifically documented phenomenon, the UK is experiencing this — as its society becomes more diverse the various ethnic groups have a splinter effect, weakening the overall national identity; 30% of Muslims in Britain do not identify as British. 7% of Muslims in Britain believe that Muslims should not have to obey British laws.

This causes ghettoization and ethnic enclaves, for example, there are 751 Muslim ghettos in France.

Peterson compared the systems that form the structure of the armed forces to be similar enough to wider society to draw an accurate comparison — low IQ people have been abused, manipulated, dominated and exploited (as per the natural order) throughout known history by populations of higher average IQ, it’s an inevitability of natural order — think of the major empires, colonialism, and so on — social Darwinists are correct, lovey-dovey liberal social justice is wrong — I’d like to say we can meet somewhere in the middle, acknowledge the strengths and weaknesses of humans in society, but don’t compromise on pursuing excellence, strength, and vitality in human populations wherever possible — this pursuit of excellence is a social standard that is fading rapidly in the West, now we have overt relativism, now we have the idea bad is good and good is bad, etc, etc, etc.

Richard Hall Reveals Strange Findings On Jo Cox Murder

Richard Hall from Richplanet TV recently released a video detailing some strange and interesting findings on Jo Cox’s murder in 2016 in the run up to the UK’s Brexit vote.

Here’s the video description:

When the Jo Cox assassination occurred in June 2016, many questions were raised over the veracity of the official version of events. Some say the trial was staged and the outcome preordained by mainstream media. Richard has met with first hand witnesses to the events and has met with friends of the alleged perpetrator Tommy Mair. In this lecture Richard presents the findings of his independent investigation to date. He is appealing for viewers to go to their MP and show them his lecture on Jo Cox’s murder. Richard clearly demonstrates that the trial was at the very least a farce, and quite possibly 100% fraudulent. The mainstream media (as usual) were used to sell to the public an entirely false motive for the murder. Anyone with more information please contact Richard in confidence via the contact page on the Richplanet website.

The Architecture of Language: Words And Their Power

Words are the definitive gateway to information; our comprehension of them, their arrangement, their tonality — the etymology of words holds the power of rhetoric, obfuscation, and also sub-topics such as phonologicalmorphologicalsyntactic, and semantic complexity.

Words are an undisputed facet of sociological soft power; if you sweep a pattern of language throughout a population, it will rule over itself and become a self-regulating hive mind, our exposure to something (such as language) correlates with our resulting subconscious identity, to change the social landscape is to get people accustomed to it and become part of it whether willingly or not, and then to defend it as an extension of themselves.

Soft power is: “a persuasive approach to international relations, typically involving the use of economic or cultural influence.”

propaganda-14-638“Wordier” language and verbosity is associated with knowledge, intelligence, professionalism, and the scholarly — as a result, flowery language is used liberally in masking areas that officials don’t want public meddling, they’ll also refer to “the professional opinion” as if to encourage viewers to let the “professional” do the thinking for them on the issue. Unsurprisingly, this “professional” spokesperson is often cherry-picked to back their angle on the information.

What you can’t properly understand you can’t begin to control or influence meaningfully.

clmkcvfwyaanugr-large
I can’t verify whether Juncker said this, however this sums up the kind of attitude much of the establishment has. Dependence on irreverence and ignorance.

On the other hand; simple, immediately accessible, well-articulated language is plastered over information that officials want to rapidly permeate social consciousness, it comes attached with key sociological catalysts; the emotional hook; a palatable story travels very far.

There is no topic complex enough that it cannot be taught in simple, understandable ‘layman’s’ terms that offers meaningful insight, yet simple stories for mainstream media remain too simplistic and unavailing in their delivery, mostly offering an entry-level insight with an authoritative tone, one that asserts affirmative information with no basis to make such a claim.

They can get away with this, build up the false reputation, the suits and ties, the “working studio” backdrop, these people look like professionals — and by professional, I really mean yes-men taught to write persuasively, acting as well-trained, domesticated mouthpieces for the elites.

Obfuscation has been notably used in the vaccine industry controversy, Jon Rappoport explains,

“For example: shuffling various disease and disorder labels; studies claiming there is no link between vaccines and autism; the hoops the government makes parents jump through, in order to try to obtain financial compensation for their damaged children; the legal deal allowing vaccine manufacturers to avoid law suits; the invented cover stories claiming autism begins in utero or is a genetic disorder; the pretension that autism has even been defined-

All lies. All avoidances.

A child gets a vaccine. The child suffers brain damage. That happens.

Then why does the government say, over and over, that vaccines are safe? Because they want to lie.

Vaccine damage is being called autism.

It diverts attention from the grave harm vaccines are causing.

Autism is essentially any kind of severe neurological damage a child suffers from ‘unknown’ causes.

There is not a day that goes by without the media reminding us about who and what type of people we should be afraid of (and who we should trust), this authoritative tone is how they choose to deliver their language.

Likewise, complex terms in the mainstream are wordy, yet just as simplistic as the former, saying a lot but actually explaining very little; sophistic. This inflationary use of language permeates all mainstream media.

Hence — economics for example, money (the exchange process upon which human civilization depends) is shrouded in jargon, inaccessible, dense language that dissuades the curious mind — to crush our diction, a deluge of simpleton’s language sweeps into our consciousness day in, day out, via social media, TV, and other platforms of mainstream manufactured media (they actively demand simple, stripped-down language in all journalistic writing).

George Orwell’s 1984 spoke of the ‘destruction of words’:

“It’s a beautiful thing, the Destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn’t only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word, which is simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take ‘good,’ for instance. If you have a word like ‘good,’ what need is there for a word like ‘bad’? ‘Ungood’ will do just as well – better, because it’s an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of ‘good,’ what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like ‘excellent’ and ‘splendid’ and all the rest of them? ‘Plusgood’ covers the meaning or ‘doubleplusgood’ if you want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already, but in the final version of Newspeak there’ll be nothing else. In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words – in reality, only one word. Don’t you see the beauty of that, Winston? It was B.B.’s idea originally, of course,” he added as an afterthought. 

By curtailing frivolous and “fighting” words, the Party seeks to narrow the range of thought altogether, such that eventually, thoughtcrime will be literally impossible.

Words are the hallmarks of our thought.

The soft power of inhibiting and centralizing a population’s vocabulary goes a long way in limiting the scope of that population’s thought — word control is thought control, if you can’t fathom the words to express how you feel, or the patterns of language in your head are repetitive and hypnotic; drawing upon language for an original & critical insight becomes difficult.

When all you hear is the same story repackaged on the many media outlets (all owned by the same few companies) your conscious recall can only think to draw from their small pool of hyper-centralized, dumbed-down, echo-chambered information. Most of mainstream ‘news’ is the weather, unimportant bulletins, and sports, ad nauseam.

The conscious mind is flooded with trash, the unconscious mind (where individual thought happens) is, as a result, overridden, the compartmentalization of thought by repeating the dimensions of accepted reality each and every moment of each and every day.

Like the brutally revolting, inarticulate minimalism of post-modernist architecture, the simplification of language is making the linguistic cultural landscape equally ugly and inexpressive; the death of individual expression is upon us.

Read any book from pre-WW2 era and the language is an expressive display of terminology and diction. Every word a gateway to yet more information, a whole new topic for each term — modern language glosses over this for the sake of ‘minimalism’, it argues that simple is better (true in some cases, so long as there is actually meaningful expression).

“Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten.” — 1984, George Orwell

The rise of “text speak”, memes, and emoticons/emojis is another indication language as we know it is declining into irreverence. This slackened speech has brought about a situation where people don’t want to write to express themselves, apathy has risen to dangerous levels — formality itself has lost its role outside of the workplace, as a society we cannot seem to take issues seriously on an individual basis outside of paid work, we quickly relapse into the clutches of memes and sound-bite news feeds; all fast food for language comprehension and engagement.

Emoticons have an emotional pretense, they indicate our feelings, rather than our articulated thoughts and reasoning.

Mumble rap is a prime example of the cultural degradation of language, a form of music that involves poor lyrics and slurred, nearly inaudible speech; the elites are pulling strings to get this trash over-represented in our culture; popularity and fame is an illusion today, if you buy into it without your own independent assessment of the cultural landscape, you help to perpetuate this controlled cultural decline.

LGBTQ, compelled speech, and political correctness.

5aa15f4797bfd

With the rise of major social group-think in the latter part of the 20th century through to the present day, the inability to even use certain words, phrases, and lines of thought is worrying.

Off-limits topics such as race realism, critique of Israel, the major banking families & their associated power structures, questioning the Holocaust, migration, advocating nationalism, and so on, has produced a fearful population unable to step ‘outside of the box’, we have been cornered into a mental prison.

The postmodernist bubble lacks a value structure, it lacks structure full-stop, it’s a deconstructionist ideology aimed at liquidizing Western culture and Western social and political structures that get in the way of establishing a world order. The sooner we all can realize this, the better.