Social Engineers Have Gamed Men & Women Into Lowering Their SMV

Featured article from The New Modern Man.

Chateau Heartiste has an interesting take on why women don’t find men attractive, anymore. (Beyond the fact the government nipple has supplanted men’s traditional provisioning scheme.)

It should come as no surprise that effeminate men who follow orders and try to be one of the girls rather than one of the guys repel women deep down in their hindbrains, even though their forebrains trick them into saying the opposite thanks to constant Deep State controlled MSM manipulation. The full article is here. A key excerpt from that piece:

Soyboys who cloyingly parrot feminist vagitudes and profess an abiding belief in the equality, sameness, and interchangeability of the sexes leave women emotionally cold, if not intellectually underwhelmed. And in the business of romance, the hindbrain owns the forebrain.

This is why careerist shrikes have such a hard time finding a man. They too want a man who will ‘provide and protect’, but their economic, occupational, and social success means that a vanishingly small pool of men can fit their bill. So they go alone to their cat graves, bitter and spiteful and leaning in to the lonesome last, tragicomic victims of their own hypergamy that evolved in an environment and sexual market in which women didn’t waste years of prime fertility pursuing the corner office.

Here’s the psychology backing up his claim. This practice of women becoming barren career girls and men sackless simps didn’t just fall out of the sky. It was a cleverly designed covert attack on men and women using the cloak of media and advertising, employing methods pioneered by Sigmund Freud’s American nephew. Prepare yourself, as you’re about to enter a realm of evil many people can’t even comprehend. Suffice it to say when moneyed interests and government bureaucrats get together, bad things happen.

Men and women have been gamed into doing things that make each sex less attractive to the other by Anglo American social engineers for roughly a century, though the pace and intensity of this business of mindfucking has definitely picked up in the last 20 years or so.

Making a long story short social engineers, no doubt serving their evil, sociopathic masters in the elite ruling class used Freudian psychology (particularly his penis envy theory, which explains why feminists try to emulate men rather than their happier, more fertile and feminine grandmothers) to manipulate us into becoming perfect, socially atomized consumers. Women go off to work to try and be like men, wasting their decade of peak fertility chasing pointless credentials and feels. This makes women less attractive to men, who value femininity and fertility in women. Men, barraged by constant propaganda telling them masculinity is evil try to become more feminine.

Both behaviors drive each sex away from the other. People who are socially atomized are easier to manipulate and control. Unspeakable evil, homegrown in the USA. This system worked and it worked damn well until the Internet came along and broke up the centralized communication model the propaganda machine depended on.

Freud’s nephew Edward Bernays is the father of the propaganda model all media and advertising have used for a century, and he frequently used the penis envy theory to manipulate women. (Search Edward Bernays here on TNMM to find the relevant history, as some of these ideas have been discussed before.) Bernays’ first successful campaign was for Philip Morris, aimed at getting women to start smoking. The entire campaign was based on Freud’s penis envy theory. Bernays then went on to work for the U.S. government.

Today, Clotaire Rapaille who designs ads for most of the Fortune 100 companies uses methods Bernays pioneered. The propaganda (not just penis envy, but now constant and invented security threats meant to trick people into giving up their freedoms one by one) is meant to appeal to the hindbrain rather than the forebrain – which explains the invented, farcical emotional appeals liberals now use to manipulate millions via the corporate and Deep State controlled fake news media. It also explains why women pat male feminists on the head but never get hot and bothered by them.

Unfortunately, people are so gullible when this brainwashing is dressed up with clever slogans like “female empowerment” they scurry off and proceed to destroy their SMV without a wit as to what’s been done to them.

This sort of social engineering has become so advanced and so cleverly disguised it poses a serious threat to the survival of not only our nation but the human species itself. What are the ultimate aims of social engineers? To eliminate sex altogether and grow custom designed, genetically engineered human beings in pods? That’s a serious question. Because anyone paying attention knows they’re doing everything they can to destroy sexual attraction.

The Coming 80 IQ “Precariat” Slave Underclass

The admixture of poor genetics and the subsidization and subsequent rise of poor genetics with the genetic quality of the de facto ruling class remaining the same will mean the rise of a precariat, ~80 IQ underclass ruled over by a ruling class about 30-40 IQ points (Ashkenazi Jewish IQ) above the average 80 IQ person — if the threat of eminent genetic & amplified social stratification doesn’t sound problematic, I don’t know what does — especially when it is well documented in scientific literature that genetics largely define us characteristically; and, on the macroscopic level, the characteristics of distinct nations of peoples — nearly every reliably measured psychological trait, especially IQ, is significantly influenced by genetic factors.

To look at at on an individual basis is too short-sighted, it’s like saying “let’s allow the third world to flood into Europe and assess them all as individuals” — ah, by which time the vast bulk of the deviant swathes have established themselves as parasites and run rampant. It’s impractical to be too liberal on matters like this; a meritocratic, and most importantly pragmatic immigration policy is needed, a migrant comes to work, they have a purpose here, they are assessed on their qualifications and due placement in wider society — to accept a large group from a region known for its poor genetics and third world tendencies and to hope to assess them all as “individuals” is a pipe dream.

There must be compromise, sometimes absolute acts are necessary to solve partial issues.

Today’s open-door migrant policy-makers know very well that most of the third world migrants won’t be employed, will disproportionately commit the most crime, will disproportionately be welfare claimants; the statistics prove it (e.g. all available studies find that non-European immigrants to Britain cost about $10 billion/year).

Thus the authorities duck away when asked to list the background of migrant criminals, the media preaches how it is “irrelevant” to question the demographics behind society’s major negative trends.

Mass migration is not about economics, or even assisting an ageing Europe (pro-natal policies can easily amend that) this is about replacement, nothing less — the installment of an uncouth, dysgenic rabble that is more easily ruled over, the New World Order wants boots on the ground, a large impoverished workforce that will fall in line — third world African and Arab migrants offer this.

The imposition of the third world (generally poorer genes) on the first world (generally better genes) by force, under the cover of a hard-fought establishment propaganda campaign claiming “integration” and “assimilation” can happen between racial groups of greatly differing intelligence (it can’t, by the way) — combined with the safety net of welfare guarantees, means the proliferation of bad genetics — I predict this will soon mean the average person’s IQ will be 20 IQ points lower than it currently is in the Western world within the next century.

Nature naturally classifies itself implicitly; nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities — elite-funded social justice is attempting to bury this truth; that inequality is inherent in nature and is inevitable whether we like it or not — those in power know this, their social campaigns have had us forget that “equality” is a farce, only they benefit from “equality” — allowing different incompatible groups equal say is asking for tribalism to take hold, making it easy for picking apart with sensationalist rhetoric and demagoguery in the democratic process, diversity is balkanisation of the electorate with the media pitching the groups against one another, rich versus poor, black versus white, man versus woman — any modicum of reason is lost in the process.

They claim the African is just “oppressed”, never given his chance to shine — they blame the white man for oppressing the other races, when it was just nature taking its course. The strong, naturally, found their way to dominance — the weak faded away, or took on a lesser role.

“The earth continues to go round, whether it’s the man who kills the tiger or the tiger who eats the man. The stronger asserts his will, it’s the law of nature.” — Adolf Hitler

It harms the best of us, and emboldens the weakest; forced “equality” is forced redistribution, a way of keeping a homogeneous underclass, and its overlords’ positions, intact — because of this, it comes down to how we can best practically mitigate inequality in nature in a sensible way — a comprehensive eugenics program should be important in ensuring the biological stratification of humans doesn’t become yet more divergent and yet more damaging to collective human freedoms, civility, and intelligence — any given society is the average of its individuals, do we want to pursue a Western world populated by below average individuals (who are allowed to vote, by the way). Is it wise to degrade the average individual? I don’t think so.

Our negligent allowance of the mass importation and subsidization of poor genetics while knowing that these people know nothing of freedoms, nothing of human rights, nothing of free press, basic liberties and so on (they don’t seem to value them, either) — and, they are living apart from those who could influence them positively; their ignorance is being preserved and legitimized, they pass on nothing of value to the new generations that will follow; the third world social bubble ensues.

How will it vote? How will it shape the West? Will it stand firm in individuality, or cave to crony collectivism? I think most of us can see the collision course in motion.


How is the new ~80 IQ model citizen created?

80 IQ point average is an optimistic number.

To find the new average IQ, just draw up the average recorded scores of the major ethnic groups arriving in the current “migrant crisis” P.S. it’s called a “migrant crisis” to hide the fact it is completely orchestrated.

The newly introduced groups will settle and proliferate faster than native Caucasian populations and rise to demographic prominence.

Conversely, native Caucasians will either engage in miscegenation, or dwindle due to the falling white birthrate, compounded by organised social and toxicological affronts to white fertility.

Let’s look at this graph; the major countries of migrant origin include Syria, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Albania, Iraq, Eritrea, Serbia, Pakistan, Ukraine, Nigeria, Somalia, Russia, Macedonia, Gambia, Iran, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Senegal.

The non inter-European migrants are mostly Arabian and African in origin, both of these regions have a combined average biological IQ in the 70-80 region, as a previous article outlined; that’s barely functional in society, literally baseline functionality.

Some of the most oppressive and thoroughly corrupt regimes have been in countries of races maladjusted to holding such power to account.

  • Look to China with its one-party system with elections now recently discontinued, the people live as slaves, subjected to extreme censorship laws and a brutal regime that will not hesitate to crush dissenters.
  • Look to the nations of Africa, military dictatorships that have no civil order whatsoever; it’s pretty much always been that way.
  • South America is the same story, drug lords rule here, imperial Western interests hold big sway in agreement with the cartels.
  • And so on…

In the West — there is corruption, I’m not denying it.

But it is largely held at bay by an inquisitive, constitutionally switched-on populace, the West is more free than anywhere else for that reason alone — why else is it the premier global migrant destination? Because the people have defended their rights to property, to free speech, to self-determination — albeit not their banking systems and many areas and decisions of their government.

It’s the last holdout of liberty and true individual prosperity in the world.

Map_of_the_European_Migrant_Crisis_2015

Causes of national differences? (Mostly) genes.

Sources: refer to this webpage.

  • Since the 20th century, there have been worldwide continual increases in measured IQ. This rise has been correlated with degrees of rising education levels, and as such may provide a partial explanation for observed differences in average IQ scores between nations. One recent study suggests that the Flynn effect has ended in some developed nations such as Denmark and Norway, and suggests that this is due to immigration from countries with lower education levels or due to changes in education policies within the countries. Wicherts et al. have suggested that national differences in IQ could be because African countries have not yet experienced the improvements that cause the Flynn effect in the developed world, such as improvements in nutrition and health, and educational attainment.
  • Kanazawa writes that cold climate and harsh winters (the study uses mean annual temperature) as well as environment novelty (the study uses three different measures of distance from the ancestral environment in sub-Saharan Africa: ordinary distance and differences in latitudes and longitudes) have been proposed as important factors behind the genetic evolution of human intelligence. The study found independent support for both theories and argues that they together explain half to two-thirds of variance in national IQ. This study has been criticized by Wicherts et al. (2012) for multiple alleged flaws, including assuming that the Earth is flat, and that humans migrated in the most direct possible route, even if that route involved crossing the ocean. They conclude that these flaws “…should have precluded publication of the paper as constituted at the time of review.”
  • The sub-Saharan African IQ estimated from TIMSS studies from 72.4 to 65.9, rounded to 66.
  • The present research found that the Muslim country mean IQ of 81 is half a standard deviation below the mean IQ of non-Muslim nations and is not related to strength of Muslim culture as defined by the percentage of Muslims in the country. The mean IQ of 84 in Arab countries is not associated with per capita income and is incompatible with the intellectual achievements of the golden age of the Muslim Empire. Possible explanations for this decline include hybridization with sub-Saharan Africans, dysgenic decrease in the more educated Muslims employing birth control as suggested by Meisenberg, the Muslim religion not fostering critical thinking, and the intellectual contributions being both exaggerated and made by non-Muslims.
  • Wicherts, Borsboom, and Dolan (2010) criticized this and some other evolutionary studies for problems such as ignoring or assuming that the Flynn effect is equal worldwide and assuming that there have been no migrations and changes in climate over the course of evolution. “In addition, we show that national IQs are strongly confounded with the current developmental status of countries. National IQs correlate with all the variables that have been suggested to have caused the Flynn Effect in the developed world.”
  • Eppig, Fincher, and Thornhill (2010) states that distance from Africa, temperature, and most importantly by a large margin, prevalence of infectious disease predict national IQs. Education, literacy, GDP, and nutrition were not important as independent factors (however, the prevalence of infectious diseases is likely greatly affected by these factors). The authors argue that “From an energetics standpoint, a developing human will have difficulty building a brain and fighting off infectious diseases at the same time, as both are very metabolically costly tasks” and that “the Flynn effect may be caused in part by the decrease in the intensity of infectious diseases as nations develop.”
  • Becker and Rindermann (2016) found a moderate correlation between genetic distances, particularly with respect to geographic latitude, and cross-national IQ differences, even when controlled for factors such as Human Development Index, indicating an evolutionary explanation. Woodley of Menie et al. (2016) found that the frequencies of eight SNPs predictive of IQ correlated negatively with national fertility, and furthermore that the SNP meta-gene negatively predicts national fertility when HDI is controlled, “suggesting the existence of a selection pressure” that may reduce global g by 0.253 points per decade.

Ultimately a slave underclass forming the bulk of voters will mean liberties being chipped away faster, wage and living standards dropping big time, and an overall regression into the serfdom seen in previous eras.

The crucial voices of the reasonable will be drowned out. Full-on mob rule will take hold — the prospects for a continued orderly and rational civilization will die with the emergence of this mutating mob as it sinks its talons into the very things that uphold Western civilization; not realizing that in myopically seizing these things, it will come to destroy them too. When you come from a place of barbarism, you grab at what you can and hold tight, you don’t think about the wider picture, especially with bad genetics it makes things yet harder.

Brexit Derangement Hysteria Reaches New Levels

The strongly anti-Brexit, hyper-centralized mainstream media has come back with a new wave of fear mongering while toting the “possibility of a second referendum”, as a “dreaded no-deal scenario” comes closer. It seems likely that the no-deal Brexit scenario won’t happen — Theresa May, under pressure by the Masonic deep state, will likely keep us tied to European treaties, unless her cabinet keeps up the pressure. Several key pro-Brexit ministerial resignations suggests that May has veered towards upending the Brexit process.

The truth is, the UK in the EU is part of a socialist political, social, and economic redistribution and restructuring process that spreads resources across Europe, bolstering a single “European” entity under a bureaucratic and unelected government in Brussels. It’s goal is anti national representation and pro-bloc representation. No single nation is allowed to become too powerful, bureaucratic red tape is laden across anything and everything to disadvantage stronger nations and bolster the weaker, all the while Brussels holds all the influence.

The EU was and is solely an avenue designed to abolish nationhood and form a superstate; big chunks of the British economy are taken to bail out other failing nation states, fund them, and prop them up.

“No erosion of essential national sovereignty”, that was the promise to the UK upon entering the EEC in 1973. This promise has been broken.

The whole arrangement is protectionist while it backdoor floods European nations with rootless third world migrants who will vote to further consolidate European power and erode national identities — the goal being to plummet labor costs and create the next China or India, making Europe an economic powerhouse at the expense of the living standards of the average person.

The media is revving up the propaganda machine and pre-programming the general public into passively accepting a “half-in, half-out” deal which will keep the UK essentially tied to the EU, they do this by putting out material that is extremely negative about the situation to get people’s minds more accustomed to a soft Brexit.

After the new Brexit minister Dominic Raab (now unsurprisingly sidelined by May) claimed that the UK would “thrive” in a no-deal scenario; the media has moved in to redress the narrative — with the aforementioned hysterics.

Jacob Rees-Mogg called the renewed anti-Brexit push “Project Fear on speed”, adding: “It is a fallacy that countries will unilaterally decide to stop selling you their goods.” (The EU doesn’t have federal assent, yet, to impose something like that).

“The idea that food will not get through at Dover is entirely wrong” said Rees-Mogg,

“We would be free to import food, medicines, fuel as we wished and the EU could only stop this if it were to impose sanctions, which is not a credible thought.”

Newly elected populist leader, Matteo Salvini stated that “My experience in the European parliament tells me you either impose yourself or they swindle you,” alluding to Theresa May’s forgoing approach to negotiations.

Salvini, who recently advocated a “League of Leagues” to unite EU govts aiming to ‘defend their borders’, stated that he “will tour capital cities, and not just European ones, to create an alternative to this Europe founded on exploitation… [and] mass immigration.”

Back to Brexit.

So, what has the media concocted this time? Well…

The hysteria is obvious — what is equally clear is that the UK’s assets, economic power, and global influence is tangible, undeniable, and speaks for itself in, or out, of the EU — empty rhetoric, on the other hand, has led many to forget this reality.

If you’re in any doubt about the UK’s situation post-Brexit as the UK moves from EU vassalage arrangements to proper international agreements, read this article for an alternative, more sober take.