The WW1 Conspiracy

“If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” — Gutle Schnaper, Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s wife.

Understanding why the World Wars were deliberately created.

Wars have always been the catalysts of massive change in human civilization since the dawn of time. Wars force people to grasp at security, to clamor for an answer in the midst of chaos, for when we are comfortable; we are complacent, rigid, and uncompromising, real change has most often come in times of desperation — hence “Order out of chaos”, or “Ordo ab chao”, a Masonic principle and motto of the 33rd degree of Scottish Rite Freemasonry. Such a term states the necessity of conflict in bringing forth order, and the interchangeability of what is “good”, and what is “evil”.

The chaos (CHAO) is the society we see around us today and it is the builders who influence the leaders to manufacture this chaos so that they can conceal their creations in darkness while they work towards the light (ORDO). Without chaos there would never be order. Without darkness, there can be no light and without light there can be no darkness. What is the “AS ABOVE”, is the “SO BELOW” of this Secret Brotherhood.

The eminent banking families of the era knew this ancient principle, and swore by it (and still do):

They had (and still have) the influence to ignite major conflicts to set the scene for their brand of politics; the politics of globalization, and that is exactly what they did by funding all sides of the world wars. This was a time far more nationalistic than now, a time of many kings, not few, the real challenge of the secret Masonic Anglo-American order was conquering them all without firing a single shot of their own.

The great wars brought Europe to its knees and did away with the old order (shattering the strength of the Ottoman Empire, British Empire, Russians, Germans, etc) in exchange for the new order: the rise of the UN, the EU, and the European nations’ financial and military dependence on the Masonic globalist bankers.

Political centralization was accelerated in the disguise of being a safeguard against another great war. Later on, the Soviet Union was funded and created as an excuse to keep these globalist political institutions in place.

The Soviets were the much needed “red terror” to unite the Western nations against — for fear is one of the most compelling emotions, a great dose of which kept European nationalism subdued and the globalist vision sustained right through to present times.

How it all began.

World War one, known as the “Great War” and, most infamously, “the war to end all wars”, was one of the bloodiest conflicts in known human history. It all began with three influential men. Among some of the wealthiest individuals in British society:

  1. William T. Stead — Major English newspaper editor who, as a pioneer of investigative journalism, became a controversial figure of the Victorian era.
  2. Reginald Brett, aka Lord Esher — an éminence grise, a friend, confidante and adviser to Victoria, Edward VII, and George V. Known as one of the primary powers behind the throne of his era.
  3. Cecil Rhodes — An enormously wealthy diamond magnate, visionary, and major Rothschild affiliate, whose exploits in South Africa and ambition to transform the African continent would earn him the nickname of “colossus”.

Cecil Rhodes, who, with the Rothschild-Rhodes company, made an extortionate amount of money exploiting South Africans in the wildly profitable mining industry, would have the finances and links to start building a network of like-minded influential people prepared to further influence the course of modern history.

Rhodes was a pioneering advocate of globalization, saying of the English, “I contend that we are the first race in the world, and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race. I contend that every acre added to our territory means the birth of more of the English race who otherwise would not be brought into existence.”

Rhodes was open with his ambitions, an 1890 article entitled “Mr. Rhode’s Ideal of Anglo-Saxon Greatness” was published by the aforementioned Mr. William T. Stead, who was a key publicist for Rhodes’ ideals.

The article featured the stunning subhead; “He believed a wealthy secret society should work to secure the world’s peace, and a British-American Federation.”

“(The) Idea for the development of the English-speaking race was the foundation of ‘a society copied, as to organization, from the Jesuits’.”

“We could arrange with the present members of the United States Assembly and our House of Commons to achieve the peace of the world.”

The article quotes Rhodes as saying:

“The only thing feasible to carry out this idea, is a secret society, gradually absorbing the wealth of the world.”

Here are some videos from The Corbett Report, one of the most reputable, well-researched sources of independent media:

Rhodes wanted to make the British Empire a superpower in which all of the British-dominated countries in the empire, including Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Cape Colony, would be represented in the British Parliament. Rhodes included American students as eligible for the Rhodes scholarships. He said that he wanted to breed an American elite of philosopher-kings who would have the United States rejoin the British Empire. As Rhodes also respected and admired the Germans and their Kaiser, he allowed German students to be included in the Rhodes scholarships. He believed that eventually the United Kingdom (including Ireland), the US, and Germany together would dominate the world and ensure perpetual peace.

After Cecil Rhodes.

Rhodes left a vast sum of money in his will after his death in 1902 to various influential confidantes, in the posthumous W. T Stead published “The Last Will and Testament” of 1902, Rhode’s reasoning was outlined:

It stated that he lamented the loss of America from the British Empire and that they should formulate a secret society with the specific aim of bringing America back into the Empire. Then he lists all the countries he needs to include in this list to have world domination, to have an English-speaking union, to have British race as the enforced culture in all countries worldwide.

He sought support, funding, plans, his agenda was in place — his funds left to those he trusted, and soon after this WW1, WW2 and so forth occurred, modern history quickly took shape.

The Round Table Group.

After Rhode’s death in 1902, this secret society revealed itself slightly, revealing itself as a force for world peace. Its modus operandi was imperialism, a secretive continuation of the open imperialism of previous centuries.

The Boer war was orchestrated to consolidate Rothschild power over the resources of South Africa.

Sir Alfred Milner, a close associate of Rhodes, was instrumental in igniting the Boer War:

“I precipitated the crisis, which was inevitable before it was too late. It is not very agreeable, and in many eyes, not a very creditable piece of business to have been largely instrumental in bringing about a war.”

When W. T. Stead initially objected to the Boer War, Rhodes told him:

“You will support Milner in any measure that he may take short of war. I make no such limitation. I support Milner absolutely without reserve. If he says peace, I say peace; if he says war, I say war. Whatever happens, I say ditto to Milner.”

Rising Germany & The Pre-WW1 Days.

German ascendance in geopolitical power in Europe threatened the Masonic hegemony and world vision, in order to crush the independence of the major European powers, with Germany’s Kaiser being the most threatening, not to mention Russia’s Tsar, it required a devastating war, that war would be WW1 and the Bolshevik revolution.

Lord Esher was a close confidante of the King, a monarch with a hands-on approach to foreign diplomacy and a disdain for the rise of German power, such a sentiment dovetailed perfectly in line with the group’s aims. With insiders in Russia and France, the Triple Entente formed, the pincer that would crush Germany and, in the chaos of war, ruin the other major European nations.

In the run up to the war, the British press released story after story framing Germans as hostiles in every regard, bringing public perception in line with the goals of the master plan.

The British helped the Japanese in the 1904-05 war against Russia, another major national competitor. Japan turned to Cecil Rhodes’ co-conspirator Lord Nathan Rothschild, who supplied them with munitions, copious funds, and denied the Russians access to the Suez canal and high-quality coal, which the British did provide to the Japanese. All this helped Japan win the war.

The Japanese fleet was even constructed in Britain, but these facts did not find their way into the Milner controlled press.

When the Russian navy accidentally fired on a British fishing ship in the north sea in 1904 the British public was outraged. The British foreign office, remarkably, tried to pin this incident on the Germans, triggering a press war between the British and the Germans.

Another aggrandizement came when there were (unsubstantiated) scares over the Germans seizing Morocco, an important trade route out of the Mediterranean, once again the media spun the story to make the Germans appear the aggressors.

The Beginning of WW1.

Eventually the elite got their way when Franz Ferdinand was shot, soon after this, the series of diplomatic and political traps were sprung, controversy engulfed the political class of Europe. Not long after this Europe was at war.

In retrospect, the machinations that led to this war are a masterclass in how power really operates in society. The military compacts that committed Britain and ultimately the world to war had nothing to do with elected parliaments or representative democracy.

When Conservative Prime Minister Arthur Balfour resigned in 1905, deft political manipulations ensured that members of The Round Table; including Herbert Henry Asquith, Edward Grey, and Richard Haldane; three men who liberal leader Henry Campbell-Bannerman privately accused of “Milner worship”, seamlessly slid into key positions in the new liberal government, and continued the strategy of German encirclement without missing a step.

In fact, the details of Britain’s military commitments to Russia and France, and even the negotiations themselves, were deliberately kept hidden from members of Parliament, and even members of the Cabinet who were not part of the secret society. It wasn’t until November 1911, a full six years into the negotiations, that the Cabinet of Prime Minister Herbert Henry Asquith started to learn the details of these agreements; agreements that had been repeatedly and officially denied in the press and in Parliament.

The result of the first world war achieved the intended result; to simplify the world stage and do away with the once-powerful dynasties of old, creating a power vaccum for the new order.

Aftermath.

In the aftermath of the war, four empires disappeared: the German, Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman, and Russian. Four dynasties, together with their ancillary aristocracies, fell as a result of the war: the Romanovs, the Hohenzollerns, the Habsburgs, and the Ottomans. Yet one major dynasty still reigned supreme, the Rothschild dynasty and its affiliated ancillaries.

Soon after, the League of Nations was formed on 28 June 1919, which eventually became the UN, following WW2, this was taken yet further as the European Union was formed with a direct reference to avoiding massive war in Europe again. The EU’s main website states “The European Union is set up with the aim of ending the frequent and bloody wars between neighbours, which culminated in the Second World War.” Yet it was these massive wars that were ignited to justify such a political reformation.

The same dialectic was enacted with the “War on Terror” in recent times to justify intervention in places the world order desires to control. I see no ends to such deception so long as the eminent Western banking dynasties persist.

Advertisements

Brexit Derangement Hysteria Reaches New Levels

The strongly anti-Brexit, hyper-centralized mainstream media has come back with a new wave of fear mongering while toting the “possibility of a second referendum”, as a “dreaded no-deal scenario” comes closer. It seems likely that the no-deal Brexit scenario won’t happen — Theresa May, under pressure by the Masonic deep state, will likely keep us tied to European treaties, unless her cabinet keeps up the pressure. Several key pro-Brexit ministerial resignations suggests that May has veered towards upending the Brexit process.

The truth is, the UK in the EU is part of a socialist political, social, and economic redistribution and restructuring process that spreads resources across Europe, bolstering a single “European” entity under a bureaucratic and unelected government in Brussels. It’s goal is anti national representation and pro-bloc representation. No single nation is allowed to become too powerful, bureaucratic red tape is laden across anything and everything to disadvantage stronger nations and bolster the weaker, all the while Brussels holds all the influence.

The EU was and is solely an avenue designed to abolish nationhood and form a superstate; big chunks of the British economy are taken to bail out other failing nation states, fund them, and prop them up.

“No erosion of essential national sovereignty”, that was the promise to the UK upon entering the EEC in 1973. This promise has been broken.

The whole arrangement is protectionist while it backdoor floods European nations with rootless third world migrants who will vote to further consolidate European power and erode national identities — the goal being to plummet labor costs and create the next China or India, making Europe an economic powerhouse at the expense of the living standards of the average person.

The media is revving up the propaganda machine and pre-programming the general public into passively accepting a “half-in, half-out” deal which will keep the UK essentially tied to the EU, they do this by putting out material that is extremely negative about the situation to get people’s minds more accustomed to a soft Brexit.

After the new Brexit minister Dominic Raab (now unsurprisingly sidelined by May) claimed that the UK would “thrive” in a no-deal scenario; the media has moved in to redress the narrative — with the aforementioned hysterics.

Jacob Rees-Mogg called the renewed anti-Brexit push “Project Fear on speed”, adding: “It is a fallacy that countries will unilaterally decide to stop selling you their goods.” (The EU doesn’t have federal assent, yet, to impose something like that).

“The idea that food will not get through at Dover is entirely wrong” said Rees-Mogg,

“We would be free to import food, medicines, fuel as we wished and the EU could only stop this if it were to impose sanctions, which is not a credible thought.”

Newly elected populist leader, Matteo Salvini stated that “My experience in the European parliament tells me you either impose yourself or they swindle you,” alluding to Theresa May’s forgoing approach to negotiations.

Salvini, who recently advocated a “League of Leagues” to unite EU govts aiming to ‘defend their borders’, stated that he “will tour capital cities, and not just European ones, to create an alternative to this Europe founded on exploitation… [and] mass immigration.”

Back to Brexit.

So, what has the media concocted this time? Well…

The hysteria is obvious — what is equally clear is that the UK’s assets, economic power, and global influence is tangible, undeniable, and speaks for itself in, or out, of the EU — empty rhetoric, on the other hand, has led many to forget this reality.

If you’re in any doubt about the UK’s situation post-Brexit as the UK moves from EU vassalage arrangements to proper international agreements, read this article for an alternative, more sober take.

Proof: Low-level IQ Means Low-level Civilization

People with an IQ (intelligence quotient) under 83 are useless in a modern technological society. That statement makes 100% common sense, but I have to keep saying it in this day and age of double-think; that real, quantifiable (not perceived) inequalities between humans actually exist, and need to be seriously considered and tackled.

Scaling above an IQ of 83 (83-90) you have barely competent, but lacking in independent critical & creative thought.

At around 100 points things change; critical thought and creative ability emerges, it is dulled, but crucially, it is present.

100 is where Anglo society currently sits, the string-pullers want to drop this statistic by about 10 IQ points through mass immigration, reducing the white birthrate, and encouraging miscegenation — they’ll push any social engineering campaign at their disposal to smooth-over the transition period, instill guilt in the naysayers, and foment conflict in the ranks of the unyielding conservatives.

Their goal is to get a mainly migrant population; unintelligent, prone to inbreeding, and religiously obsessed — this new population will work for less, question less, and, perhaps most importantly, will not identify with the once Western “nations” they inhabit.

They will be their own prison; displaced and rootless, they will take on the new identity of the nationless and the borderless, it will seem such a grand Utopian idea to them. They will become a willing and subservient extension of any system that will satisfy their basic needs and desires — they will take the bait of big government at every hurdle and then thank them for it.

With the prongs of propaganda they will come to see the white man and his ways as their oppressor and enemy and will hold true to their old ways, complacent in their own separate society and language, told that they are acceptable as they are, rewarded for being substandard, rewarded for being perfect slaves, an overarching liberal “social justice” culture will be designed to equalize and exalt them and all their flaws above the established civilization.

Within a matter of decades, left to mix and truly lose their national roots, these migrants will vote for and back the power of a European superstate that will legislate unaccountably and perpetuate their suffering, winning their votes by claiming to “represent” them, by openly putting down the Western man who “oppresses” them — the divide and conquer strategy.

The voice of the native Western man will be rapidly drowned out as the ever-growing unintelligent, rootless, and shiftless mob will rule supreme in a democratic system that the globalist kingpins will have masterfully rigged to their total advantage.

The white man, his culture and his identity will be painted as oppressive, racist, and repugnant in every regard — while the culture, identity, and traditions of the new population will be painted in a positive light in every regard; made to appear superior to the Western society that they flee to for a better life; their crimes ignored, their shortfalls glossed-over, with liberal apologists abound in defense of third world culture’s “compatibility” with the West, the white man will be blamed for their crimes and incompetence, attributed as a figment of white oppression. These outrageous lies will be spread far and wide.

Within the puppet-aristocracy, they award themselves prizes for their acts of “social progression” through the award of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize, or the Charlemagne Prize; a prize awarded for work done in the service of “European unification”, this year EU lapdog Emmanuel Macron won the prize, previous recipients include EU bureaucrats such as Jean-Claude Juncker (2006), and Donald Tusk (2010), the pro-migration politician Angela Merkel (2008) with the EU pioneer Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi himself earning the first ever issuance of the award in 1950.

The epi-genetic and genetic plan for population control.

The Kalergi plan outlines the plan to form “a new mixed breed population” in Europe, made up of an average IQ of about 90. Competent enough to do basic or intermediate level work, but too incompetent to question the bigger picture.

Respected clinical psychologist, Jordan Peterson, lays out the science — without basic intelligence, a worker’s competency cannot be “learned”, as some claim — such incompetence, Peterson argues, is biologically innate.

The idea that anyone can “achieve their dreams” is patently false. The idea of individual self-determinism is hampered by the genetic ceiling that absolutely exists in varying degrees across groups of humans — cultural-Marxism in the education system will teach us the Martin Luther King idea that one IQ level is equal to another, that race is just “skin deep”, the uncomfortable truth is that Mr. King got it wrong, and that is precisely why he is glorified.

Peterson spoke of how the US army was motivated to find an accurate predictor of human intelligence as a means of effectively organizing and delegating human resources — from this emerged the development of the entirely reliable & indiscriminate IQ test.

“You can’t induct anyone into the US armed forces if they have an IQ of less than 83.”

At around an IQ of 83 — in the US army it is regarded that you can have no helpful role in the organisation. Muslim countries have an average IQ of just 81, 7.5 points lower than non-Muslim countries, most of the migration to Europe is from Muslim countries, we are bringing in loads of people who, according to Peterson’s analysis, cannot function in our society — isn’t that worth talking about?

Furthermore, half of all Muslims are inbred and 55% of Pakistanis in the UK are married to their cousins. What does this mean for the UK’s genetic future? It can’t mean much good if Muslim migrants are set to become the dominant demographic in a matter of decades.

Another effect is in-group preference, a scientifically documented phenomenon, the UK is experiencing this — as its society becomes more diverse the various ethnic groups have a splinter effect, weakening the overall national identity; 30% of Muslims in Britain do not identify as British. 7% of Muslims in Britain believe that Muslims should not have to obey British laws.

This causes ghettoization and ethnic enclaves, for example, there are 751 Muslim ghettos in France.

Peterson compared the systems that form the structure of the armed forces to be similar enough to wider society to draw an accurate comparison — low IQ people have been abused, manipulated, dominated and exploited (as per the natural order) throughout known history by populations of higher average IQ, it’s an inevitability of natural order — think of the major empires, colonialism, and so on — social Darwinists are correct, lovey-dovey liberal social justice is wrong — I’d like to say we can meet somewhere in the middle, acknowledge the strengths and weaknesses of humans in society, but don’t compromise on pursuing excellence, strength, and vitality in human populations wherever possible — this pursuit of excellence is a social standard that is fading rapidly in the West, now we have overt relativism, now we have the idea bad is good and good is bad, etc, etc, etc.