The Architecture of Language: Words And Their Power

Words are the definitive gateway to information; our comprehension of them, their arrangement, their tonality — the etymology of words holds the power of rhetoric, obfuscation, and also sub-topics such as phonologicalmorphologicalsyntactic, and semantic complexity.

Words are an undisputed facet of sociological soft power; if you sweep a pattern of language throughout a population, it will rule over itself and become a self-regulating hive mind, our exposure to something (such as language) correlates with our resulting subconscious identity, to change the social landscape is to get people accustomed to it and become part of it whether willingly or not, and then to defend it as an extension of themselves.

Soft power is: “a persuasive approach to international relations, typically involving the use of economic or cultural influence.”

propaganda-14-638“Wordier” language and verbosity is associated with knowledge, intelligence, professionalism, and the scholarly — as a result, flowery language is used liberally in masking areas that officials don’t want public meddling, they’ll also refer to “the professional opinion” as if to encourage viewers to let the “professional” do the thinking for them on the issue. Unsurprisingly, this “professional” spokesperson is often cherry-picked to back their angle on the information.

What you can’t properly understand you can’t begin to control or influence meaningfully.

clmkcvfwyaanugr-large
I can’t verify whether Juncker said this, however this sums up the kind of attitude much of the establishment has. Dependence on irreverence and ignorance.

On the other hand; simple, immediately accessible, well-articulated language is plastered over information that officials want to rapidly permeate social consciousness, it comes attached with key sociological catalysts; the emotional hook; a palatable story travels very far.

There is no topic complex enough that it cannot be taught in simple, understandable ‘layman’s’ terms that offers meaningful insight, yet simple stories for mainstream media remain too simplistic and unavailing in their delivery, mostly offering an entry-level insight with an authoritative tone, one that asserts affirmative information with no basis to make such a claim.

They can get away with this, build up the false reputation, the suits and ties, the “working studio” backdrop, these people look like professionals — and by professional, I really mean yes-men taught to write persuasively, acting as well-trained, domesticated mouthpieces for the elites.

Obfuscation has been notably used in the vaccine industry controversy, Jon Rappoport explains,

“For example: shuffling various disease and disorder labels; studies claiming there is no link between vaccines and autism; the hoops the government makes parents jump through, in order to try to obtain financial compensation for their damaged children; the legal deal allowing vaccine manufacturers to avoid law suits; the invented cover stories claiming autism begins in utero or is a genetic disorder; the pretension that autism has even been defined-

All lies. All avoidances.

A child gets a vaccine. The child suffers brain damage. That happens.

Then why does the government say, over and over, that vaccines are safe? Because they want to lie.

Vaccine damage is being called autism.

It diverts attention from the grave harm vaccines are causing.

Autism is essentially any kind of severe neurological damage a child suffers from ‘unknown’ causes.

There is not a day that goes by without the media reminding us about who and what type of people we should be afraid of (and who we should trust), this authoritative tone is how they choose to deliver their language.

Likewise, complex terms in the mainstream are wordy, yet just as simplistic as the former, saying a lot but actually explaining very little; sophistic. This inflationary use of language permeates all mainstream media.

Hence — economics for example, money (the exchange process upon which human civilization depends) is shrouded in jargon, inaccessible, dense language that dissuades the curious mind — to crush our diction, a deluge of simpleton’s language sweeps into our consciousness day in, day out, via social media, TV, and other platforms of mainstream manufactured media (they actively demand simple, stripped-down language in all journalistic writing).

George Orwell’s 1984 spoke of the ‘destruction of words’:

“It’s a beautiful thing, the Destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn’t only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word, which is simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take ‘good,’ for instance. If you have a word like ‘good,’ what need is there for a word like ‘bad’? ‘Ungood’ will do just as well – better, because it’s an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of ‘good,’ what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like ‘excellent’ and ‘splendid’ and all the rest of them? ‘Plusgood’ covers the meaning or ‘doubleplusgood’ if you want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already, but in the final version of Newspeak there’ll be nothing else. In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words – in reality, only one word. Don’t you see the beauty of that, Winston? It was B.B.’s idea originally, of course,” he added as an afterthought. 

By curtailing frivolous and “fighting” words, the Party seeks to narrow the range of thought altogether, such that eventually, thoughtcrime will be literally impossible.

Words are the hallmarks of our thought.

The soft power of inhibiting and centralizing a population’s vocabulary goes a long way in limiting the scope of that population’s thought — word control is thought control, if you can’t fathom the words to express how you feel, or the patterns of language in your head are repetitive and hypnotic; drawing upon language for an original & critical insight becomes difficult.

When all you hear is the same story repackaged on the many media outlets (all owned by the same few companies) your conscious recall can only think to draw from their small pool of hyper-centralized, dumbed-down, echo-chambered information. Most of mainstream ‘news’ is the weather, unimportant bulletins, and sports, ad nauseam.

The conscious mind is flooded with trash, the unconscious mind (where individual thought happens) is, as a result, overridden, the compartmentalization of thought by repeating the dimensions of accepted reality each and every moment of each and every day.

Like the brutally revolting, inarticulate minimalism of post-modernist architecture, the simplification of language is making the linguistic cultural landscape equally ugly and inexpressive; the death of individual expression is upon us.

Read any book from pre-WW2 era and the language is an expressive display of terminology and diction. Every word a gateway to yet more information, a whole new topic for each term — modern language glosses over this for the sake of ‘minimalism’, it argues that simple is better (true in some cases, so long as there is actually meaningful expression).

“Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten.” — 1984, George Orwell

The rise of “text speak”, memes, and emoticons/emojis is another indication language as we know it is declining into irreverence. This slackened speech has brought about a situation where people don’t want to write to express themselves, apathy has risen to dangerous levels — formality itself has lost its role outside of the workplace, as a society we cannot seem to take issues seriously on an individual basis outside of paid work, we quickly relapse into the clutches of memes and sound-bite news feeds; all fast food for language comprehension and engagement.

Emoticons have an emotional pretense, they indicate our feelings, rather than our articulated thoughts and reasoning.

Mumble rap is a prime example of the cultural degradation of language, a form of music that involves poor lyrics and slurred, nearly inaudible speech; the elites are pulling strings to get this trash over-represented in our culture; popularity and fame is an illusion today, if you buy into it without your own independent assessment of the cultural landscape, you help to perpetuate this controlled cultural decline.

LGBTQ, compelled speech, and political correctness.

5aa15f4797bfd

With the rise of major social group-think in the latter part of the 20th century through to the present day, the inability to even use certain words, phrases, and lines of thought is worrying.

Off-limits topics such as race realism, critique of Israel, the major banking families & their associated power structures, questioning the Holocaust, migration, advocating nationalism, and so on, has produced a fearful population unable to step ‘outside of the box’, we have been cornered into a mental prison.

The postmodernist bubble lacks a value structure, it lacks structure full-stop, it’s a deconstructionist ideology aimed at liquidizing Western culture and Western social and political structures that get in the way of establishing a world order. The sooner we all can realize this, the better.

 

 

Defining the “Individual”: The Ruler and The Ruled

While I am principally an individualist, unlike most sworn individualists (who often see all people as intrinsically, unequivocally equal; “the sanctity of the individual” and so on) and proportion their politics to this maxim, I believe that at a certain level of heritable intelligence (namely biological IQ: intelligence quotient) a person’s predisposition towards individualism declines sharply — and therefore the need for benevolent collectivism is an (inevitable) necessity in swaying these groups of people of lower intelligence that are going to take on the beliefs of someone or something sooner or later — the crux of my argument is that lower intelligence people are an ideological power vacuum — Why? It’s simple enough — they lack the reasonable individualistic capacity to be resistant to, and critical of malevolent, monolithic, collective thought and its resulting politics — they, quite simply, are lacking the intelligence to discern and exercise sensible, pragmatic individualism: an important factor in holding together a civilization and ensuring its sustainability. The history of these populations’ civilization concurs with this assertion.

The need for parity between ruler and ruled.

If an electorate lacks the intelligence to “connect the dots”, sees only its own interests (due to lack of creative and/or empathetic vision to see benevolent collective goals) — it both lacks comprehension of itself and others and falls prey to predatory politicians and rulers in all their forms.

These are rulers who will outclass such an electorate in intelligence, knowledge, practicality, conscientiousness, time preference, and just about every other trait that is a reliable predictor of success and influence in its numerable forms.

We are seeing this more and more, the Ashkenazi Jews currently rule over whites and all racial groups beneath measured by genetic IQ.

I believe, unlike the absolute assertions of Jordan Peterson that suggest it is only intelligence that accounts for Jewish influence, that, at least some element of Jewish in-group consolidation is the reason the highest echelons of power are dominated by them. There are simply too many smart non-Jewish ethnic whites for this to go unaccounted for me to believe Jewish dominance has no environmental causes whatsoever.

Peterson makes an assertion here about the nature of White-Nationalist’s outlook, one I feel makes an incorrect assumption. A White-Nationalist’s sobriety regarding race comes not from hatred, but acknowledgement of irrefutable differences between groups of humans that must be objectively taken into account, it’s white advocacy rather than white supremacy.

This, mixed in with the fact Jews came to occupy influential financial positions first before anyone else (due to Christian Europeans being unable to partake in usury historically) this helps to explain why Ashkenazi Jews dominate today — they got into positions first due to the lucky societal circumstances, and then consolidated their positions, with an element of persecution and the fact Jews were relatively ostracized, these positions likely were passed on in a nepotistic way; more so than not with the in-group in mind.

Also, most of the immoral, extraordinarily powerful so-called “Jews” are actually Judeo-MasonicSolomonic adherents — by extension, Satanists, this has served to totally mischaracterise Jews altogether. The people who are responsible for the Globalist agenda are not real Jews, they may identify as Jews publicly, but they have Masonic inspiration. For example, their very non-Jewish symbol, the “Star of David”, is a Satanic, Masonic symbol, many half-Jews have fallen for this false non-biblical imagery and have followed the so-called state of “Israel”; thinking it is a Biblical revelation.

See how the Judeo-Masonic elites are obsessed with Israel for non-Jewish reasons.

Stop opposing the broad ethno-religious group that is Judaism, it’s simply not the case that a broad group of some multi-million Jews are colluding against the world, to suggest so makes little sense. More accurately, a small sect of Solomon-praising, Satanic-Masonic “Jews” are to blame for the sheer misrepresentation of the Jewish community, and all conspiratorial behavior that has seemingly come from a broadly “Jewish” establishment.

“Masonry is a search after Light. That search leads us directly back, as you see, to the Kabalah. In that ancient and little understood medley of absurdity and philosophy, the Initiate will find the source of many doctrines; and may in time come to understand the Hermetic philosophers, the Alchemists, all the anti-Papal thinkers of the Middle Age, and Emanuel Swedenborg. Everything scientific and grand in the religious dreams of all the Illuminati, Jacob Boehme, Swedenborg, Saint-Martin, and others, is borrowed from the Kabalah; all the Masonic associations owe to it their Secrets and Symbols.”
— Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 33° freemason and founder of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.

This so-called “light” is, in essence, reverence of Lucifer not as the devil, but as a liberator, a guardian or guiding spirit, or even the true god as opposed to God (YHWH).

Judeo-Masons are obsessed with Israel in the context of Solomon; but look at how Solomon was addressed in the Bible:

“The Lord was angry with Solomon, because his heart was turned from the Lord God of Israel.” — 1 Kings 11:9

The charge against Solomon was that ‘his heart was not perfect,’ or wholly devoted to the YHWH, that he ‘went not fully’ after the YHWH. His was a case of halting between two opinions, or rather, of trying to hold both at once. He wanted to be a worshiper of YHWH and of these idols also — It is clear to see how Satanic Freemasonry is a combined religion of pagan Gods and the Judaic God, this is why the elites identify as “Jews” today, but aren’t truly so.

Jewish Mysticism is not true Judaism, it’s a non-biblical offshoot of what is sanctioned in scripture. The entry of the Kabbalah— developed roughly around the 12th century, derived from the heretical, non-inspired text, the Talmud.

Solomon the Wise was an Israelite, he was a Jew, but he turned away from God (YHWH) and pursued Satanism. Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, a Goddess connected with fertilitysexuality, and war. Her symbols were the lion, the horse, the sphinx, the dove, and a star within a circle indicating the planet Venus. Pictorial representations often show her naked. She has been known as the deified morning and/or evening star (Luciferian symbology). Solomon also began to praise Moloch/Milcom/Molech (as the Judeo-Masonic Elites do annually at the Bohemian Grove). Solomon built a high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon.

Look at the chest of this portrayal of Molech, the “Star of David” is clearly embossed in the metalwork. The “Israel” we see today is NOT Jewish!

 

The Star of David, (David, the visionary of Solomon’s Temple), is intertwined with Freemasonry’s square and compasses.

Judeo-Masonic Agenda.

Judeo-Masonic Ashkenazi “Jews” closest competitors, those most genetically similar to them, are Caucasian European whites. If whites are removed from the equation as a major demographic, then the genetic (and thus influence) gap will become wider than ever — this is what those in power are attempting to do; diminish “whiteness” in all its forms — they know the significant predictive role of race in political influence and socioeconomic systems, and are (understandably) putting all of their money into brainwashing people to be blind to this reality while carrying out their dysgenic agenda behind the scenes.

As a result of this agenda, such a dysgenic electorate will be more susceptible to emotional arguments, logical fallacies, compartmentalization, designed dialectics, irrationality, superstitions, hysteric trends, and so on — the funny thing is, we can already see how these “minority groups” are already predisposed to all of these things, yet are protected groups nonetheless — and, right before our eyes, are rapidly replacing whites in Western nations as the new dominant population with an army of liberal “progressives” employed to assure us that this will “enrich” us, all the evidence points to the contrary.

Varying intelligence: why collective thought will always have a place in human society, whether we like it or not.

It’s about mitigation — rather than hoping for a sociopolitical Utopia, I believe reasonable mitigation and sensible policy-making is enough to deliver a society that can flourish.

TL:DR — Just as individual thought will always exist relative to collective thought and vice versa; it’s a seesaw based on aforementioned factors. The further towards base consciousness a population gets the more negatively collectivist it becomes, taking on often bad ideas in lieu of their own.

The role of benevolent collectivism (such as the group-think religiosity of cultural and ethical Christianity) for susceptible groups is deliberately overlooked in postmodernist society — because certain globalist forces want to unilaterally over-represent in society genetically and/or culturally limited “individuals” that, on average, simply lack said mental faculties, know-how, background etc (due to numerous factors including historic inbreeding among many others) to represent themselves as capable individuals, and thus are more receptive to collectivism and the centralization of the state. They’re bending over backwards to represent these people: granting copious welfare, slanting society to the their defense against all sensibility, bringing in compelled speech and taboos, white guilt and so forth — it’s quite simply a bubble for a protected group, that, without such an outrageously preferential bubble – would not get very far at all.

The globalist elite want us to believe that “everyone is equal” to all other concerned citizens regardless of significant civilization-defining traits such as intelligence. Hence the ideological over-representation of Cultural Marxist ideology across all institutions owned by the trendsetters.

In lower IQ people — traits such as gullibility, a lack of receptiveness to rationality, and a predisposition towards unthinking group-think collectivism abounds, all this has a biological basis in race. Populations that operate at a more basic consciousness, i.e. concerned with R-brain matters such as sex, domination, resources on the group or individual basis, lacking the empathetic foresight to perceive and act upon wider concerns.

It is not entirely environmental as the Jew-funded Cultural Marxist institutions will insist.

Guess what? Europe will become a continent dominated by low IQ “individuals” that have just as much of a right to vote as rational, moral, and savvy individuals — the UK alone will become a Muslim country by 2050 if current demographic trends persist due to the proliferate compound nature of R-selective populations: by which point, proxy-totalitarianism will have a firmer foothold than ever.

This is bad news for the individual but great news for the centralized state.

If we look back to the societies that are today deemed “antiquated” and the “wrong side of history”, we can see various successful, influential classical societies and groups that practiced eugenics, Rome, Ashkenazi Jewry, ancient Greeks incl. Sparta, and so on. Even one of the Godfathers of philosophy, Plato, suggested the benefits selective mating to produce a guardian class.

Furthermore, we can see how Western Christian societies averted dysgenics by making legal provisions against birth of inferior human beings, this was notably promulgated in Western European culture by the Christian Council of Agde in 506, which forbade marriage between cousins. Something dysgenic populations never really did to an effective extent, the genetic rift thus widened.

Up until the mid-late 20th century, genetic discrimination such as compulsory sterilization of persons with genetic defects, the killing of the institutionalized and, specifically, segregation and genocide of races perceived as inferior was a wide societal norm, the accepted norm was that there are differences between certain groups of humans, whether we wanted to accept that or not for humanitarian reasons was, quite rightly, a secondary matter.

This article, while cautious to frame such practices and conventions as supremacist, malevolent, or otherwise, hopes to illustrate that a dysgenic society will lead to more suffering and conflict than a society with eugenicist practices ever will; and the evidence supports it.

Drawing the line as to what defines an “individual” in relation to sociopolitical systems.

Because a comprehensive system of natural selection no longer exists, (even culturally now) — the distinction between genetics that are passed on by merit and genetics passed on with the help of welfare and so on — is nonexistent, we have R-selective groups being able to pass on their genes where in a truly open, decentralized society this wouldn’t be able to happen.

In simple terms in application to political systems — smart people are often more individualist (thus, conservative and nationalistic), lower intelligence groups are less individualist (more predisposed to group-think, socialism), the role of mass-indoctrination may be able to net some fringes of higher intelligence groups but generally the core principle remains.

I propose we can relatively reliably categorize people into “capable individuals” and “incapable individuals”, largely reliably on the five racial groups and dysgenic/eugenic traits, gender, background, but also (albeit somewhat less reliably) within these groups based on class. (Cultural Marxism is all about denouncing the terms “categorical” or “general” but these are perfectly fine terms, used in the correct context).

While these assertions of justifiable partition certainly sounds collectivist and an affront to individual rights — race realism and the taxonomic significance between biological groups is founded in science; and a factor worthy of serious consideration when regarding any system of social and political arrangement.

I’ve written a whole article (called “the truth about racism”) detailing the significance of race and intelligence, so I won’t go into too much detail here, but here are a few points that help illustrate my argument:

If we cannot see the influence of race and IQ on upholding individual representation, we will fall to absolutist collectivist politics, especially as the “migrant crisis” rapidly undermines Western population of capable (higher IQ) individuals with incapable (lower IQ) individuals.

Representing the voting rights of incapable (low IQ) people is dangerous, I propose an IQ and general/applied knowledge test for eligibility to political vote. While this kind of test cannot determine moral character, at least it can determine intelligence.

Lower intelligence groups are almost always going to organize towards the characteristics of the mob, fragmentation, and group-think, whereas higher intelligence groups tend to represent their own thoughts and interpretations and have awareness of benevolent collectivism, thus shaking-off most inclinations to representing monolithic thought.

They will almost always make irresponsible, hysterical, passionate, and irrational decisions with their rights to liberty, democracy, and self-determination, by extension empowering the state; not themselves or the wider capable individual.

At a higher level of intelligence, the ability for someone to think for themselves increases, hence the commonality of individualism and democracy in Western nations occupied by races of higher overall IQ (even if Western democracies and systems that champion the individual are often subverted — the general attitude towards individualism is more common in people of higher intelligence than without).

In my opinion, this is where the role of independent collective thought such as the Bible comes in, while you can absolutely take on the teachings on your own terms, regardless of your intelligence — the importance of casting a collectivist thought process that engages with several fundamental principles such as “do not not steal”, “do not kill”, “do not lie lie”, etc based on the threat of eternal damnation is the only way to communicate to a group of people not (easily) able to operate on a rational level of thought, the Bible does this exquisitely, it uses the threat of death mixed in with something that cannot be possibly tangibly understood (a deity), the perfect enforcing combination for keeping susceptible populations in line.

The decline of Christianity as a (mostly) positive force of collectivist thought has spelled disaster for the West.

As Christianity has been mocked and destroyed in Western culture at the hands of Jewish influence, we see susceptible (lower intelligence) populations previously protected by the positive collective standards of the Bible now become receptive to new “progressive” hive-mind ideas, it really is one religion exchanged for another more materialistic one, this new nihilistic religion as Christianity’s replacement lacks any direction.

Instead, it opens vulnerable populations up to sophistic ideas that, ultimately, reduce essential liberties, that, without the safeguarding ideals of collectivist Biblical faith, have now been able to infiltrate and infect Western culture.

 

 

The Difference Between Zionism and Judaism

Many people conflate all Jews into a single category — but like any religion, culture or identity; there are subdivisions that must be acknowledged.

One common misconception that has infiltrated people’s minds through Western media is that Zionism is Judaism. The Western media does not highlight major differences that exist between Zionism and Judaism — both ideologically and theologically.

Judaism splintered and took two main paths, those who studied and obeyed core scripture, and those who began to write their own books, traditions, rules, laws, statutes and so on.

For example, the Babylonian ‘Jewish’ Talmud is an example of a false collection of texts that has negatively redefined Judaism.

The core canon is widely accepted, whereas the Talmud and its many derivatives are widely criticized for:

  1. Anti-Christian, anti-Gentile content.
  2. Absurd or sexually immoral content.
  3. Falsification of scripture.

Those who abandoned core scripture began practicing a very warped version of Judaism, forming closed-off communities that became wary of, and opposed to gentiles. This is also how ethno-religious Jewish groups such as Ashkenazi came to form.

As a result, a non-biblical “us versus them” attitude quickly formed in the rabbinical echo chambers — this is the kind of rabbinical Zionist Judaism we see today at the top of power hierarchies worldwide.

To differentiate between the groups within the broad term ‘Jew’; truly spiritual Jews are against Israel, but the Talmudic variant, and within that variant, the Talmudic Jewish racial and cultural supremacists are very pro-Israel — despite nowhere in scripture it stating that Israel is to be founded again by men in a physical sense.

In my opinion, a small denomination of so-called ‘Jews’ have totally misinterpreted the scriptures and somehow justified a supreme ‘Jewish race’ and a physical, rather than spiritual, homeland — they are a cultural and ethnic minority that abides by misunderstood rabbinical Talmudic principles and traditions which scripture does not authorize whatsoever — they have totally hijacked what being a biblical Jew actually means. Some of them have risen to the heights of Western power and are steering everything towards a Jewish Mystic, Pharisaical, Masonic World Order.

A concerted effort to bring the kingdom of heaven unto earth in a physical sense.

“For hundreds of years through all misfortunes a Messianic dream of an ideal city,
where there will be neither rich nor poor, and where perfect justice and equality will
reign, has never ceased to haunt the imagination of the Jews. In their ghettos filled
with the dust of ancient dreams, the uncultured Jews of Galicia persist in watching on
moonlight nights in the depths of the sky for some sign precursor of the coming of the
Messiah. Trotsky, Bela Kun and the others took up, in their turn, this fabulous dream.
But, tired of seeking in heaven this kingdom of God which never comes, they have
caused it to descend upon earth.” — J. and J. Tharaud

The “Synagogue of Satan”.

The Bible quite rightly anticipated that the scriptures would be misinterpreted, taken out of context, reworded, and so on.

It is an inevitability that many false iterations of Biblical faith have, and will continue to spring forth and try to represent the scriptures in the word and interpretation of men, rather than in the word of God.

The following verse warned of this:

“Behold, I will cause those of the synagogue of Satan, who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie — I will make them come and bow down at your feet, and make them know that I have loved you.” — Revelation 3:9

In the Bible, they are called the “Pharisees”, those who ‘added to and took away’ from the word of God and made it their own:

“You shall not add to the word which I am commanding you, nor take away from it, that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you.” — Deuteronomy 4:2

Zionist Jews practice their faith ‘outwardly’, not ‘inwardly’; as the Bible explicitly states they must.

The Bible advocates ‘inwards’ faith, rather than an ‘outwards’ carnal interpretation of it.

The Pharisees were Jews of the ‘written’, outwards variant of Judaism.

They practiced their faith outwardly in a literal, material sense, in contradiction to the spiritual, immaterial faith as spoken of in the scriptures.

“No, a man is a Jew because he is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written code. Such a man’s praise does not come from men, but from God.” — Romans 2:29

Understanding the mindset behind global “Jewish supremacy”.

Jewish supremacy is a very small Pharisee offshoot of the core Jewish faith — but ideal circumstances allowed it to gain massive influence, and eventually redefine what most people see to be ‘Judaism’.

A “Pharisee” is defined as:

“a member of an ancient Jewish sect, distinguished by strict observance of the traditional and written law, and commonly held to have pretensions to superior sanctity.”

The keyword from the above definition is “sect”, which is defined as:

“a group of people with somewhat different religious beliefs (typically regarded as heretical) from those of a larger group to which they belong.”

Because of their eugenicist selectivity, their scholarly societal standards, and their extreme studiousness — the Pharisaical Ashkenazi’s genetic and intellectual qualities increased dramatically, and many of them, as a result, rose to the high positions in society as we see them in today — some of them retain the cultural and supremacist rigors of their ancestors and maintain a distrust of the ‘gentile’, many of them looking to the Global Zionist objective as their ultimate goal.

Central to the Pharisaical Jew is that the gentile is a heathen to be avoided, misinterpreting the following passage as a call to segregation:

“Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership can righteousness have with wickedness? Or what fellowship does light have with darkness?” — 2 Corinthians 6:14

In the past, being a money-lender was a profession forbidden for Christians to uptake, the field was largely a power vacuum; as most of European society was Christian a few hundred years ago.

By denying Jews the stability of property ownership, Christians unwittingly forced Jews of the day into great financial expertise. This expertise has carried itself over to the present day.

“Today’s races and classes will disappear owing to the disappearing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its outward appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. The main representatives of the brain aristocracy: of capitalism, journalism and the literate are Jews. The superiority of their spirit predestines them to become a main factor of the future nobility.”

— Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, spiritual father of the EU, Freemason of the Humanitas Lodge, Vienna.

This gave Ashkenazi Zionist Jews the head-start, so to speak, in gaining the knowledge and expertise in saturating the financial field and quickly gaining economic dominance.

“We too are in agreement with the cultural anti-Semites, insofar as we believe that Germans of the Mosaic faith are an undesirable, demoralizing phenomenon.”

Physicist and Anthropologist, Gregory Cochran, states that the selective breeding culture of Ashkenazis over one thousand years would be enough to see the significant difference in IQ points seen today — which is on average 15 points higher than European average IQ.

Cochran states that the Ashkenazi population was incredibly unique — nearly every Ashkenazi worked a ‘white collar’ job; book work, money-lending, accounting, etc.

From this innate advantage and because of the high rate of Jews in financial roles, the early major Jewish banking families formed out of these circumstances, powerful families that persist to this day.

Not to say regular Europeans weren’t capable of becoming money-lenders — they were simply culturally forbidden from doing so — the Ashkenazi Zionist sects saturated the profession and quickly worked together to make it a ‘Jew-only’ business, gentiles were kept at arms length.

Certain Pharisaical Zionist Jews, often Ashkenazis, have risen and acquired significant power and influence:

  • Banking System. The entire Federal Reserve System has been setup by Jewish Families which is continuously puts the country into debt. It works above the law and it is not accountable to the government for its activities.
  • Large Corporations. Most large corporations are owned by Jews in America. All of them have moved their manufacturing to Communist China, a country that they have developed at the expense of American and European jobs. The system that they have setup drains the country’s wealth from most countries around the world into the hands of a few Jewish Entities.
  • System Beneficiaries. All of these systems that are setup mainly in the West benefit Jewish Entities at other’s expense. It is essentially fooling and cheating millions of people from several cities around the world.
  • Politics. Jewish Entities have setup very powerful lobbies in America like AIPAC and systematically control the majority of the American politicians. These politicians end up doing exactly what they are advised to do, irrespective of the fact whether it benefits the American people or not.
  • Media. 90% of media entities in America and most large media corporations are owned by Jews. They run the media as per their strategy, directing and misleading several countries with their false agendas which benefit on them. Media has been used by them to mold the psychology and direct public opinion as per their plan. This is large scale misleading of the people from true facts and ground level reality.
  • Wars. Most of the recent wars since the past 15 years have been promoted and wanted by the Israeli government and Jewish Entities. These wars have done nothing but immensely increase the country’s debt and only stalled the measures that needed to be taken to fix the economy. People also dislike the large scale promotion of hate and division promoted by these entities to justify these wars while keeping them in the dark about what needs to be done for the economy.
  • Economic Collapse. Eventually with increasing debt and new wars at hand, possibly with Iran, the economy of these countries will collapse resulting in the shutdown of several government operations. This will lead to a lot of disturbance in the country and a lack of law and order.
  • Internal Chaos. Latino and Black militants will be funded and supported by these Jewish Entities to create internal chaos within the United States. This funded and armed conflict will be blamed on Russia and its allies. The exact same system that has been implemented in Syria, of the funding of armed militants by outside elements. The exact same pattern will be used in USA. The only difference will be that they will use the Black and Latino communities to do the same. And once this conflict begins, it will have ripple effects in several cities across America with colored communities, leading to a mass internal chaos.

Supremacist Jewry.

Pharisee comes from the Hebrew root word, meaning “separate” or “detach“, this is used in a literal, segregationist sense — as opposed to the spiritual sense advocated in scripture.

Some groups of Ashkenazi Pharisees lived in closed-off communities. They taught a warped version of Judaism — teaching that all non-Jews were cattle, that Israel must be founded in a literal sense, and that they must dominate the gentile; as this was ‘God’s intent’.

How did Ashkenazi Pharisaical Zionism come to be so powerful? The genetic and cultural components.

Ashkenazi Jews are a product of a breakaway Pharisee Jewish sect, elements of which organised themselves towards a Zionist agenda.

As aforementioned, in the case of the Ashkenazi Jewish sects; their power and influence came from their rigorous convictions and their genetics that came from circumstantial and cultural ethnogenesis.

As a small population, they bred very selectively, tending to favour the most scholarly to reproduce — as well as interbreeding and acquiring the beneficial genetics of Europeans.

On the other hand, other Pharisee populations interbred with dysgenic populations and likely didn’t hold the same standards of cultural eugenics as the Ashkenazi variant, this explains why European Pharisees were more successful in spreading and implementing Zionism than other Pharisee populations; because Ashkenazis were more than capable of doing so.

The Ashkenazi genetic composition changed over many hundreds of years to the modern, highly intelligent Zionist Jews you see today — the ethnic Ashkenazi Jew.

The Ashkenazi Jews that dominate the American Jewish community have the highest average intelligence of any human group and they have shown an extraordinary ability to create and participate in highly effective groups in pursuit of their interests.

Why are Jews represented as they are? A combination of genetic and cultural components.

The Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity is represented as the 1% because it possesses the most advantageous genetics.

The rise of the Ashkenazi Jew was the perfect marriage between good genetics and a supremacist culture combined into one regional ethnic group that experienced very few dysgenic effects and remained largely culturally homogeneous, as a result — the Ashkenazi Jew, with both incredible genetic ability coupled with a ideological drive to expand ‘Jewish’ influence and subvert the ‘gentiles’ — a few Ashkenazi Jewish sects quickly came to dominate the world.

starofdavid
The Zionist Ashkenazi ‘Jew’ is not a Semitic Jew, nor a spiritual Jew.

The Zionist Pharisaical plan for world domination.

Some, although not all Ashkenazi Jewish Pharisaical sects believe they must take over the world in a literal sense, similar to some radical forms of Islam, as this would be ‘pleasing’ to their idea of God. Totally misinterpreting the spiritual rather than physical kingdom of God on earth:

“And the LORD will be king over all the earth; in that day the LORD will be the only one, and His name the only one.” — Zechariah 14:9

And while in the Bible it does say that Jews are a ‘chosen’ and ‘set apart’ people (in a spiritual sense, not a literal sense) — at no point does the Bible sanction supremacy, an exclusive ethnic and cultural identity, an exclusive homeland, persecution of the ‘goyim’, or any such segregationist, supremacist ideology.

A real Jew is made by spiritual conception and conviction, not by any inherent conception or birthright.

Why many Jews were persecuted throughout history.

Now that we’ve made the distinction between canonical, spiritual Jews and ethnic Zionist Jews we can understand why certain Jews were persecuted throughout history, and why this persecution overlapped to regular Jews as a result of a misunderstood conflation of false Jews and true Jews.

The rabbinical, supremacist, and anti-gentile attitudes seen throughout certain Ashkenazi Jewish communities meant they actively used their influence, knowledge and great intellectual capacity to undermine goyim nations.

They opted for methods such as usury and the formation of conspiratorial secret societies and economic alliances to gain financial dominance — as a result, the European natives interpreted these transgressions as representative of all Jews as criminal money-changers and swindlers, not the Zionist few; this explains the indiscriminate historic persecution and expulsion of all Jewish communities.

Other Jews were in financial positions by necessity and gained positions in the nobility and the inner circles of aristocracy because of their financial dealings. Many associated the Jew with the wrongdoings of the state many Jews were forced to serve as financiers. This contributed further to the negative image of Jews as bankers.

As a result of such indiscriminate expulsions, the Europeans “threw the baby out with the bathwater”, so to speak.

Innocent Jews were expelled along with criminal ones, and a generally poor reputation for the entire Jewish faith spread far and wide across Europe.

Meanwhile, the real culprits, the supremacist Zionist sects, were not specifically identified — the ‘Jew’, in all cases and all circumstances, was thereafter seen as the enemy and menace, this unfounded reputation largely persists to this day:

“Moreover, we do not know to this day which devil has brought them (Jews) here…like a plague, pestilence, pure misfortune in our country.” — Martin Luther, About the Jews and Their Lies, 1543