The Secret Circle That Controls Governments

Featured article from Jon Rappoport’s blog.

Who is in charge of destroying borders and separate nations?

One group has been virtually forgotten. Its influence is enormous. It has existed since 1973.

It’s called the Trilateral Commission (TC).

Keep in mind that the original stated goal of the TC was to create “a new international economic order.”

In the run-up to his inauguration after the 2008 presidential election, Obama was tutored by the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

In 1969, four years before birthing the TC with David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote: “[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation state.”

Goodbye, separate nations.

Any doubt on the question of TC goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, the founder of the TC, in his Memoirs (2003): “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure-one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Patrick Wood, author of Trilaterals Over Washington, points out there are only 87 members of the Trilateral Commission who live in America. Obama appointed eleven of them to posts in his administration.

For example:

  • Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary;
  • James Jones, National Security Advisor;
  • Paul Volker, Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee;
  • Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence.

Here is a stunning piece of forgotten history, a 1978 conversation between a US reporter and two members of the Trilateral Commission. (Source: Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management; ed. by Holly Sklar, 1980, South End Press, Pages 192-3).

The conversation was public knowledge at the time.

Anyone who was anyone in Washington politics, in media, in think-tanks, had access to it. Understood its meaning.

But no one shouted from the rooftops. No one used the conversation to force a scandal. No one protested loudly.

The conversation revealed that the entire basis of the US Constitution had been torpedoed, that the people who were running US national policy were agents of an elite shadow group. No question about it.

And yet: official silence. Media silence. The Dept. of Justice made no moves, Congress undertook no serious inquiries, and the President, Jimmy Carter, issued no statements. Carter was himself an agent of the Trilateral Commission in the White House. He had been plucked from obscurity by David Rockefeller, and through elite TC press connections, vaulted into the spotlight as a pre-eminent choice for the Presidency.

The following 1978 conversation featured reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and Richard Cooper. The interview took up the issue of who exactly, during President Carter’s administration, was formulating US economic and political policy.

The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser and Cooper is astonishing. It’s as if they’re saying, “What we’re revealing is already out in the open, it’s too late to do anything about it, why are you so worked up, we’ve already won…”

NOVAK (the reporter): Is it true that a private [Trilateral committee] led by Henry Owen of the US and made up of [Trilateral] representatives of the US, UK, West Germany, Japan, France and the EEC is coordinating the economic and political policies of the Trilateral countries [which would include the US]?

COOPER: Yes, they have met three times.

NOVAK: Yet, in your recent paper you state that this committee should remain informal because to formalize ‘this function might well prove offensive to some of the Trilateral and other countries which do not take part.’ Who are you afraid of?

KAISER: Many countries in Europe would resent the dominant role that West Germany plays at these [Trilateral] meetings.

COOPER: Many people still live in a world of separate nations, and they would resent such coordination [of policy].

NOVAK: But this [Trilateral] committee is essential to your whole policy. How can you keep it a secret or fail to try to get popular support [for its decisions on how nations will conduct their economic and political policies]?

COOPER: Well, I guess it’s the press’ job to publicize it.

NOVAK: Yes, but why doesn’t President Carter come out with it and tell the American people that [US] economic and political power is being coordinated by a [Trilateral] committee made up of Henry Owen and six others? After all, if [US] policy is being made on a multinational level, the people should know.

COOPER: President Carter and Secretary of State Vance have constantly alluded to this in their speeches. [a lie]

KAISER: It just hasn’t become an issue.

This interview slipped under the mainstream media radar, which is to say, it was buried.

US (and other nations’) economic and political policy run by a committee of the Trilateral Commission—the Commission created in 1973 by David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

When Carter won the presidential election (1976), his aide, Hamilton Jordan, said that if after the inauguration, Cy Vance and Brzezinski came on board as secretary of state and national security adviser, “We’ve lost. And I’ll quit.” Lost—because both men were powerful members of the Trilateral Commission and their appointment to key positions would signal a surrender of White House control to the Commission.

Vance and Brzezinski were appointed secretary of state and national security adviser, as Jordan feared. But he didn’t quit. He became Carter’s chief of staff.

Now consider the vast propaganda efforts of the past 40 years, on so many levels, to install the idea that all nations and peoples of the world are a single Collective.

From a very high level of political and economic power, this propaganda op has had the objective of grooming the population for a planet that is one coagulated mass, run and managed by one force. A central engine of that force is the Trilateral Commission.

—One planet, with national borders erased, under one management system, with a planned global economy, “to restore stability,” “for the good of all, for lasting harmony.”

And one day in the future, a student would ask his teacher, “What happened to the United States?” And the teacher would say, “It was a criminal enterprise based on individual freedom. Fortunately, our leaders rescued the people and taught them the superior nature of HARMONY AND COOPERATION.”

—However, the rough, uneven, and challenging nationalism surfacing in a number of countries is evidence that many people are waking up from, and resisting, the Trilateral Collectivist trance…

Social Engineers Have Gamed Men & Women Into Lowering Their SMV

Featured article from The New Modern Man.

Chateau Heartiste has an interesting take on why women don’t find men attractive, anymore. (Beyond the fact the government nipple has supplanted men’s traditional provisioning scheme.)

It should come as no surprise that effeminate men who follow orders and try to be one of the girls rather than one of the guys repel women deep down in their hindbrains, even though their forebrains trick them into saying the opposite thanks to constant Deep State controlled MSM manipulation. The full article is here. A key excerpt from that piece:

Soyboys who cloyingly parrot feminist vagitudes and profess an abiding belief in the equality, sameness, and interchangeability of the sexes leave women emotionally cold, if not intellectually underwhelmed. And in the business of romance, the hindbrain owns the forebrain.

This is why careerist shrikes have such a hard time finding a man. They too want a man who will ‘provide and protect’, but their economic, occupational, and social success means that a vanishingly small pool of men can fit their bill. So they go alone to their cat graves, bitter and spiteful and leaning in to the lonesome last, tragicomic victims of their own hypergamy that evolved in an environment and sexual market in which women didn’t waste years of prime fertility pursuing the corner office.

Here’s the psychology backing up his claim. This practice of women becoming barren career girls and men sackless simps didn’t just fall out of the sky. It was a cleverly designed covert attack on men and women using the cloak of media and advertising, employing methods pioneered by Sigmund Freud’s American nephew. Prepare yourself, as you’re about to enter a realm of evil many people can’t even comprehend. Suffice it to say when moneyed interests and government bureaucrats get together, bad things happen.

Men and women have been gamed into doing things that make each sex less attractive to the other by Anglo American social engineers for roughly a century, though the pace and intensity of this business of mindfucking has definitely picked up in the last 20 years or so.

Making a long story short social engineers, no doubt serving their evil, sociopathic masters in the elite ruling class used Freudian psychology (particularly his penis envy theory, which explains why feminists try to emulate men rather than their happier, more fertile and feminine grandmothers) to manipulate us into becoming perfect, socially atomized consumers. Women go off to work to try and be like men, wasting their decade of peak fertility chasing pointless credentials and feels. This makes women less attractive to men, who value femininity and fertility in women. Men, barraged by constant propaganda telling them masculinity is evil try to become more feminine.

Both behaviors drive each sex away from the other. People who are socially atomized are easier to manipulate and control. Unspeakable evil, homegrown in the USA. This system worked and it worked damn well until the Internet came along and broke up the centralized communication model the propaganda machine depended on.

Freud’s nephew Edward Bernays is the father of the propaganda model all media and advertising have used for a century, and he frequently used the penis envy theory to manipulate women. (Search Edward Bernays here on TNMM to find the relevant history, as some of these ideas have been discussed before.) Bernays’ first successful campaign was for Philip Morris, aimed at getting women to start smoking. The entire campaign was based on Freud’s penis envy theory. Bernays then went on to work for the U.S. government.

Today, Clotaire Rapaille who designs ads for most of the Fortune 100 companies uses methods Bernays pioneered. The propaganda (not just penis envy, but now constant and invented security threats meant to trick people into giving up their freedoms one by one) is meant to appeal to the hindbrain rather than the forebrain – which explains the invented, farcical emotional appeals liberals now use to manipulate millions via the corporate and Deep State controlled fake news media. It also explains why women pat male feminists on the head but never get hot and bothered by them.

Unfortunately, people are so gullible when this brainwashing is dressed up with clever slogans like “female empowerment” they scurry off and proceed to destroy their SMV without a wit as to what’s been done to them.

This sort of social engineering has become so advanced and so cleverly disguised it poses a serious threat to the survival of not only our nation but the human species itself. What are the ultimate aims of social engineers? To eliminate sex altogether and grow custom designed, genetically engineered human beings in pods? That’s a serious question. Because anyone paying attention knows they’re doing everything they can to destroy sexual attraction.