Social Engineers Have Gamed Men & Women Into Lowering Their SMV

Featured article from The New Modern Man.

Chateau Heartiste has an interesting take on why women don’t find men attractive, anymore. (Beyond the fact the government nipple has supplanted men’s traditional provisioning scheme.)

It should come as no surprise that effeminate men who follow orders and try to be one of the girls rather than one of the guys repel women deep down in their hindbrains, even though their forebrains trick them into saying the opposite thanks to constant Deep State controlled MSM manipulation. The full article is here. A key excerpt from that piece:

Soyboys who cloyingly parrot feminist vagitudes and profess an abiding belief in the equality, sameness, and interchangeability of the sexes leave women emotionally cold, if not intellectually underwhelmed. And in the business of romance, the hindbrain owns the forebrain.

This is why careerist shrikes have such a hard time finding a man. They too want a man who will ‘provide and protect’, but their economic, occupational, and social success means that a vanishingly small pool of men can fit their bill. So they go alone to their cat graves, bitter and spiteful and leaning in to the lonesome last, tragicomic victims of their own hypergamy that evolved in an environment and sexual market in which women didn’t waste years of prime fertility pursuing the corner office.

Here’s the psychology backing up his claim. This practice of women becoming barren career girls and men sackless simps didn’t just fall out of the sky. It was a cleverly designed covert attack on men and women using the cloak of media and advertising, employing methods pioneered by Sigmund Freud’s American nephew. Prepare yourself, as you’re about to enter a realm of evil many people can’t even comprehend. Suffice it to say when moneyed interests and government bureaucrats get together, bad things happen.

Men and women have been gamed into doing things that make each sex less attractive to the other by Anglo American social engineers for roughly a century, though the pace and intensity of this business of mindfucking has definitely picked up in the last 20 years or so.

Making a long story short social engineers, no doubt serving their evil, sociopathic masters in the elite ruling class used Freudian psychology (particularly his penis envy theory, which explains why feminists try to emulate men rather than their happier, more fertile and feminine grandmothers) to manipulate us into becoming perfect, socially atomized consumers. Women go off to work to try and be like men, wasting their decade of peak fertility chasing pointless credentials and feels. This makes women less attractive to men, who value femininity and fertility in women. Men, barraged by constant propaganda telling them masculinity is evil try to become more feminine.

Both behaviors drive each sex away from the other. People who are socially atomized are easier to manipulate and control. Unspeakable evil, homegrown in the USA. This system worked and it worked damn well until the Internet came along and broke up the centralized communication model the propaganda machine depended on.

Freud’s nephew Edward Bernays is the father of the propaganda model all media and advertising have used for a century, and he frequently used the penis envy theory to manipulate women. (Search Edward Bernays here on TNMM to find the relevant history, as some of these ideas have been discussed before.) Bernays’ first successful campaign was for Philip Morris, aimed at getting women to start smoking. The entire campaign was based on Freud’s penis envy theory. Bernays then went on to work for the U.S. government.

Today, Clotaire Rapaille who designs ads for most of the Fortune 100 companies uses methods Bernays pioneered. The propaganda (not just penis envy, but now constant and invented security threats meant to trick people into giving up their freedoms one by one) is meant to appeal to the hindbrain rather than the forebrain – which explains the invented, farcical emotional appeals liberals now use to manipulate millions via the corporate and Deep State controlled fake news media. It also explains why women pat male feminists on the head but never get hot and bothered by them.

Unfortunately, people are so gullible when this brainwashing is dressed up with clever slogans like “female empowerment” they scurry off and proceed to destroy their SMV without a wit as to what’s been done to them.

This sort of social engineering has become so advanced and so cleverly disguised it poses a serious threat to the survival of not only our nation but the human species itself. What are the ultimate aims of social engineers? To eliminate sex altogether and grow custom designed, genetically engineered human beings in pods? That’s a serious question. Because anyone paying attention knows they’re doing everything they can to destroy sexual attraction.

Advertisements

Why Father’s Day Matters

The outright assault on the traditional family structure continues. This time, Father’s Day, an annual day set aside to appreciate the healthy father figure in people’s lives, but even this couldn’t stay pure for long.

Good Morning Britain tweeted that:

“Is it time to ban Father’s Day? With a rise in single parent, blended, and same-sex families, is it time to get more inclusive and appreciate parents all year round?”

With a total disregard for the science behind a non-traditional family structure, the mainstream media is bashing a symbol of stability, success, happiness, and wellbeing.

The negative effect of non-traditional families on human wellbeing is astonishingly understated, as I will explain.

Here’s some facts:

  • Single parent households double the likelihood of child mental illness.
  • Single mothers are more likely to get ill when they get older.
  • Children raised by gay couples are twice as likely to be in poverty as children of straight married couples.
  • Households with a single mother and a non-biological father have the highest rates of child abuse and neglect.
  • 85% of children who exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes.
  • Boys who grow up in fatherless homes have significantly lower testosterone levels than average.
  • Children born to single mothers show higher levels of aggressive behavior than children born to married mothers.
  • 71% of high school dropouts come from fatherless homes.
  • 70% of juveniles in state operated institutions come from fatherless homes.
  • 71% of adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes.
  • 63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes.

Stefan Molyneux, a popular philosophy YouTuber, covered the effects of female-headed/single mother households and the associated poverty rates. In every example poverty rates were above that of the average poverty rate and the poverty rate of married couple families.

Welfare rewards and encourages social instability and boosts dependence on the state/big government.

Molyneux also discussed in the video below that in the West the introduction of welfare has subsidized irresponsibility by taxing stable, good income families and redistributing the resources to keep single mother households afloat. The effect of this is placing pressure on responsible members of society and encouraging social instability by funding the lower-end of society and helping it flourish.

Molyneux argues that because society is accustomed to the “safety net” guarantee of welfare, it feels at liberty to make irresponsible decisions and involve itself in marriages, decisions and partnerships that are dysfunctional rather than practical.

Welfare has broken apart the strength of strong, effective families and replaced it with an irreverence towards forging lasting, stable relationships — which form the bedrock of society.

To take things further, the deep state economists and legislators are perfectly aware that subsidizing bad decisions will equal more bad decisions. In fact, it’s their goal; suppress social stability and cohesion in the masses, promote fragmentation, atomization and encourage an unhealthy dependence and allegiance to a nanny/provider state, that, by extension, gets to call all the shots and direct all policy-making unhindered.

Feeding a cancer helps it to grow — the welfare state is a powerful fertilizer for the social cancers that afflict western civilization.

More welfare emboldens the weak, erodes the stable middle class, and empowers the deep state.

maxresdefault (1).jpg

Proof: Low-level IQ Means Low-level Civilization

People with an IQ (intelligence quotient) under 83 are useless in a modern technological society. That statement makes 100% common sense, but I have to keep saying it in this day and age of double-think; that real, quantifiable (not perceived) inequalities between humans actually exist, and need to be seriously considered and tackled.

Scaling above an IQ of 83 (83-90) you have barely competent, but lacking in independent critical & creative thought.

At around 100 points things change; critical thought and creative ability emerges, it is dulled, but crucially, it is present.

100 is where Anglo society currently sits, the string-pullers want to drop this statistic by about 10 IQ points through mass immigration, reducing the white birthrate, and encouraging miscegenation — they’ll push any social engineering campaign at their disposal to smooth-over the transition period, instill guilt in the naysayers, and foment conflict in the ranks of the unyielding conservatives.

Their goal is to get a mainly migrant population; unintelligent, prone to inbreeding, and religiously obsessed — this new population will work for less, question less, and, perhaps most importantly, will not identify with the once Western “nations” they inhabit.

They will be their own prison; displaced and rootless, they will take on the new identity of the nationless and the borderless, it will seem such a grand Utopian idea to them. They will become a willing and subservient extension of any system that will satisfy their basic needs and desires — they will take the bait of big government at every hurdle and then thank them for it.

With the prongs of propaganda they will come to see the white man and his ways as their oppressor and enemy and will hold true to their old ways, complacent in their own separate society and language, told that they are acceptable as they are, rewarded for being substandard, rewarded for being perfect slaves, an overarching liberal “social justice” culture will be designed to equalize and exalt them and all their flaws above the established civilization.

Within a matter of decades, left to mix and truly lose their national roots, these migrants will vote for and back the power of a European superstate that will legislate unaccountably and perpetuate their suffering, winning their votes by claiming to “represent” them, by openly putting down the Western man who “oppresses” them — the divide and conquer strategy.

The voice of the native Western man will be rapidly drowned out as the ever-growing unintelligent, rootless, and shiftless mob will rule supreme in a democratic system that the globalist kingpins will have masterfully rigged to their total advantage.

The white man, his culture and his identity will be painted as oppressive, racist, and repugnant in every regard — while the culture, identity, and traditions of the new population will be painted in a positive light in every regard; made to appear superior to the Western society that they flee to for a better life; their crimes ignored, their shortfalls glossed-over, with liberal apologists abound in defense of third world culture’s “compatibility” with the West, the white man will be blamed for their crimes and incompetence, attributed as a figment of white oppression. These outrageous lies will be spread far and wide.

Within the puppet-aristocracy, they award themselves prizes for their acts of “social progression” through the award of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize, or the Charlemagne Prize; a prize awarded for work done in the service of “European unification”, this year EU lapdog Emmanuel Macron won the prize, previous recipients include EU bureaucrats such as Jean-Claude Juncker (2006), and Donald Tusk (2010), the pro-migration politician Angela Merkel (2008) with the EU pioneer Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi himself earning the first ever issuance of the award in 1950.

The epi-genetic and genetic plan for population control.

The Kalergi plan outlines the plan to form “a new mixed breed population” in Europe, made up of an average IQ of about 90. Competent enough to do basic or intermediate level work, but too incompetent to question the bigger picture.

Respected clinical psychologist, Jordan Peterson, lays out the science — without basic intelligence, a worker’s competency cannot be “learned”, as some claim — such incompetence, Peterson argues, is biologically innate.

The idea that anyone can “achieve their dreams” is patently false. The idea of individual self-determinism is hampered by the genetic ceiling that absolutely exists in varying degrees across groups of humans — cultural-Marxism in the education system will teach us the Martin Luther King idea that one IQ level is equal to another, that race is just “skin deep”, the uncomfortable truth is that Mr. King got it wrong, and that is precisely why he is glorified.

Peterson spoke of how the US army was motivated to find an accurate predictor of human intelligence as a means of effectively organizing and delegating human resources — from this emerged the development of the entirely reliable & indiscriminate IQ test.

“You can’t induct anyone into the US armed forces if they have an IQ of less than 83.”

At around an IQ of 83 — in the US army it is regarded that you can have no helpful role in the organisation. Muslim countries have an average IQ of just 81, 7.5 points lower than non-Muslim countries, most of the migration to Europe is from Muslim countries, we are bringing in loads of people who, according to Peterson’s analysis, cannot function in our society — isn’t that worth talking about?

Furthermore, half of all Muslims are inbred and 55% of Pakistanis in the UK are married to their cousins. What does this mean for the UK’s genetic future? It can’t mean much good if Muslim migrants are set to become the dominant demographic in a matter of decades.

Another effect is in-group preference, a scientifically documented phenomenon, the UK is experiencing this — as its society becomes more diverse the various ethnic groups have a splinter effect, weakening the overall national identity; 30% of Muslims in Britain do not identify as British. 7% of Muslims in Britain believe that Muslims should not have to obey British laws.

This causes ghettoization and ethnic enclaves, for example, there are 751 Muslim ghettos in France.

Peterson compared the systems that form the structure of the armed forces to be similar enough to wider society to draw an accurate comparison — low IQ people have been abused, manipulated, dominated and exploited (as per the natural order) throughout known history by populations of higher average IQ, it’s an inevitability of natural order — think of the major empires, colonialism, and so on — social Darwinists are correct, lovey-dovey liberal social justice is wrong — I’d like to say we can meet somewhere in the middle, acknowledge the strengths and weaknesses of humans in society, but don’t compromise on pursuing excellence, strength, and vitality in human populations wherever possible — this pursuit of excellence is a social standard that is fading rapidly in the West, now we have overt relativism, now we have the idea bad is good and good is bad, etc, etc, etc.