Why Father’s Day Matters

The outright assault on the traditional family structure continues. This time, Father’s Day, an annual day set aside to appreciate the healthy father figure in people’s lives, but even this couldn’t stay pure for long.

Good Morning Britain tweeted that:

“Is it time to ban Father’s Day? With a rise in single parent, blended, and same-sex families, is it time to get more inclusive and appreciate parents all year round?”

With a total disregard for the science behind a non-traditional family structure, the mainstream media is bashing a symbol of stability, success, happiness, and wellbeing.

The negative effect of non-traditional families on human wellbeing is astonishingly understated, as I will explain.

Here’s some facts:

  • Single parent households double the likelihood of child mental illness.
  • Single mothers are more likely to get ill when they get older.
  • Children raised by gay couples are twice as likely to be in poverty as children of straight married couples.
  • Households with a single mother and a non-biological father have the highest rates of child abuse and neglect.
  • 85% of children who exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes.
  • Boys who grow up in fatherless homes have significantly lower testosterone levels than average.
  • Children born to single mothers show higher levels of aggressive behavior than children born to married mothers.
  • 71% of high school dropouts come from fatherless homes.
  • 70% of juveniles in state operated institutions come from fatherless homes.
  • 71% of adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes.
  • 63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes.

Stefan Molyneux, a popular philosophy YouTuber, covered the effects of female-headed/single mother households and the associated poverty rates. In every example poverty rates were above that of the average poverty rate and the poverty rate of married couple families.

Welfare rewards and encourages social instability and boosts dependence on the state/big government.

Molyneux also discussed in the video below that in the West the introduction of welfare has subsidized irresponsibility by taxing stable, good income families and redistributing the resources to keep single mother households afloat. The effect of this is placing pressure on responsible members of society and encouraging social instability by funding the lower-end of society and helping it flourish.

Molyneux argues that because society is accustomed to the “safety net” guarantee of welfare, it feels at liberty to make irresponsible decisions and involve itself in marriages, decisions and partnerships that are dysfunctional rather than practical.

Welfare has broken apart the strength of strong, effective families and replaced it with an irreverence towards forging lasting, stable relationships — which form the bedrock of society.

To take things further, the deep state economists and legislators are perfectly aware that subsidizing bad decisions will equal more bad decisions. In fact, it’s their goal; suppress social stability and cohesion in the masses, promote fragmentation, atomization and encourage an unhealthy dependence and allegiance to a nanny/provider state, that, by extension, gets to call all the shots and direct all policy-making unhindered.

Feeding a cancer helps it to grow — the welfare state is a powerful fertilizer for the social cancers that afflict western civilization.

More welfare emboldens the weak, erodes the stable middle class, and empowers the deep state.

maxresdefault (1).jpg

A “United States of Europe” by 2025

Merkel associate, Martin Schulz, has let slip the Brussels grand plan for a “United States of Europe” by 2025.

This means the end for sovereign European nation states, it means unlimited third world migration to water-down the enlightened electorate with the politically illiterate, and the creation of a superstate driven by low-paid migrant workers.

What a united European superstate means for Globalism.

There is no conspiracy. The EU is completely open about its superstate plan.

They set out their ambition in black and white – to create a monetary union, a political union, a social union: in essence, to take a load of disparate countries and to try to fuse them into one, with common citizenship and loyalty to a “European” idea. It’s actually a globalist idea, a Zionist idea for greater power to the deviant few.

By absorbing nations into a political, social, and economic bloc, you exert total control over them, and you make sure they cannot be swayed by the Russians or Chinese. This is an exercise of safeguarding influence, packaging it into a binding political contract that is marketed as for the ‘greater good’.

  • The single European army: an army consisting of all the nation states’ armed forces. According to Hans-Peter Bartels, Germany’s national defense commissioner, “In the end, there will be a European army”.

“We do not want to go down the solitary national path any more. Not in Germany, not in the Netherlands, not in the Czech Republic and not in Italy.”

This is simply a way the globalists can streamline control of their European puppets, a single foreign policy for Europe makes things streamlined. It’s just less paperwork and more control. It will be marketed to Europe as a way for ‘greater security’, in reality it is dangerous centralization under an unaccountable, unelected governing body.

  • One currency, better protectionist markets: with a European economy under one roof the globalists can streamline their protectionist economic strategies to put pressure on China and Russia.

The EU could have a dedicated minister of economy and finance by 2019.

After Brexit, the eurozone will represent 85% of the EU’s economic output and 76% of the population. Outsiders will become second-class members without clout in the EU.

  • End of national representation: the people of Europe will not have a say in the deliberations of the European superstate, no democratic model has been offered, and it seems to be far from an enlightened autocracy.