The Secret Circle That Controls Governments

Featured article from Jon Rappoport’s blog.

Who is in charge of destroying borders and separate nations?

One group has been virtually forgotten. Its influence is enormous. It has existed since 1973.

It’s called the Trilateral Commission (TC).

Keep in mind that the original stated goal of the TC was to create “a new international economic order.”

In the run-up to his inauguration after the 2008 presidential election, Obama was tutored by the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

In 1969, four years before birthing the TC with David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote: “[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation state.”

Goodbye, separate nations.

Any doubt on the question of TC goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, the founder of the TC, in his Memoirs (2003): “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure-one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Patrick Wood, author of Trilaterals Over Washington, points out there are only 87 members of the Trilateral Commission who live in America. Obama appointed eleven of them to posts in his administration.

For example:

  • Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary;
  • James Jones, National Security Advisor;
  • Paul Volker, Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee;
  • Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence.

Here is a stunning piece of forgotten history, a 1978 conversation between a US reporter and two members of the Trilateral Commission. (Source: Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management; ed. by Holly Sklar, 1980, South End Press, Pages 192-3).

The conversation was public knowledge at the time.

Anyone who was anyone in Washington politics, in media, in think-tanks, had access to it. Understood its meaning.

But no one shouted from the rooftops. No one used the conversation to force a scandal. No one protested loudly.

The conversation revealed that the entire basis of the US Constitution had been torpedoed, that the people who were running US national policy were agents of an elite shadow group. No question about it.

And yet: official silence. Media silence. The Dept. of Justice made no moves, Congress undertook no serious inquiries, and the President, Jimmy Carter, issued no statements. Carter was himself an agent of the Trilateral Commission in the White House. He had been plucked from obscurity by David Rockefeller, and through elite TC press connections, vaulted into the spotlight as a pre-eminent choice for the Presidency.

The following 1978 conversation featured reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and Richard Cooper. The interview took up the issue of who exactly, during President Carter’s administration, was formulating US economic and political policy.

The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser and Cooper is astonishing. It’s as if they’re saying, “What we’re revealing is already out in the open, it’s too late to do anything about it, why are you so worked up, we’ve already won…”

NOVAK (the reporter): Is it true that a private [Trilateral committee] led by Henry Owen of the US and made up of [Trilateral] representatives of the US, UK, West Germany, Japan, France and the EEC is coordinating the economic and political policies of the Trilateral countries [which would include the US]?

COOPER: Yes, they have met three times.

NOVAK: Yet, in your recent paper you state that this committee should remain informal because to formalize ‘this function might well prove offensive to some of the Trilateral and other countries which do not take part.’ Who are you afraid of?

KAISER: Many countries in Europe would resent the dominant role that West Germany plays at these [Trilateral] meetings.

COOPER: Many people still live in a world of separate nations, and they would resent such coordination [of policy].

NOVAK: But this [Trilateral] committee is essential to your whole policy. How can you keep it a secret or fail to try to get popular support [for its decisions on how nations will conduct their economic and political policies]?

COOPER: Well, I guess it’s the press’ job to publicize it.

NOVAK: Yes, but why doesn’t President Carter come out with it and tell the American people that [US] economic and political power is being coordinated by a [Trilateral] committee made up of Henry Owen and six others? After all, if [US] policy is being made on a multinational level, the people should know.

COOPER: President Carter and Secretary of State Vance have constantly alluded to this in their speeches. [a lie]

KAISER: It just hasn’t become an issue.

This interview slipped under the mainstream media radar, which is to say, it was buried.

US (and other nations’) economic and political policy run by a committee of the Trilateral Commission—the Commission created in 1973 by David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

When Carter won the presidential election (1976), his aide, Hamilton Jordan, said that if after the inauguration, Cy Vance and Brzezinski came on board as secretary of state and national security adviser, “We’ve lost. And I’ll quit.” Lost—because both men were powerful members of the Trilateral Commission and their appointment to key positions would signal a surrender of White House control to the Commission.

Vance and Brzezinski were appointed secretary of state and national security adviser, as Jordan feared. But he didn’t quit. He became Carter’s chief of staff.

Now consider the vast propaganda efforts of the past 40 years, on so many levels, to install the idea that all nations and peoples of the world are a single Collective.

From a very high level of political and economic power, this propaganda op has had the objective of grooming the population for a planet that is one coagulated mass, run and managed by one force. A central engine of that force is the Trilateral Commission.

—One planet, with national borders erased, under one management system, with a planned global economy, “to restore stability,” “for the good of all, for lasting harmony.”

And one day in the future, a student would ask his teacher, “What happened to the United States?” And the teacher would say, “It was a criminal enterprise based on individual freedom. Fortunately, our leaders rescued the people and taught them the superior nature of HARMONY AND COOPERATION.”

—However, the rough, uneven, and challenging nationalism surfacing in a number of countries is evidence that many people are waking up from, and resisting, the Trilateral Collectivist trance…

Social Engineers Have Gamed Men & Women Into Lowering Their SMV

Featured article from The New Modern Man.

Chateau Heartiste has an interesting take on why women don’t find men attractive, anymore. (Beyond the fact the government nipple has supplanted men’s traditional provisioning scheme.)

It should come as no surprise that effeminate men who follow orders and try to be one of the girls rather than one of the guys repel women deep down in their hindbrains, even though their forebrains trick them into saying the opposite thanks to constant Deep State controlled MSM manipulation. The full article is here. A key excerpt from that piece:

Soyboys who cloyingly parrot feminist vagitudes and profess an abiding belief in the equality, sameness, and interchangeability of the sexes leave women emotionally cold, if not intellectually underwhelmed. And in the business of romance, the hindbrain owns the forebrain.

This is why careerist shrikes have such a hard time finding a man. They too want a man who will ‘provide and protect’, but their economic, occupational, and social success means that a vanishingly small pool of men can fit their bill. So they go alone to their cat graves, bitter and spiteful and leaning in to the lonesome last, tragicomic victims of their own hypergamy that evolved in an environment and sexual market in which women didn’t waste years of prime fertility pursuing the corner office.

Here’s the psychology backing up his claim. This practice of women becoming barren career girls and men sackless simps didn’t just fall out of the sky. It was a cleverly designed covert attack on men and women using the cloak of media and advertising, employing methods pioneered by Sigmund Freud’s American nephew. Prepare yourself, as you’re about to enter a realm of evil many people can’t even comprehend. Suffice it to say when moneyed interests and government bureaucrats get together, bad things happen.

Men and women have been gamed into doing things that make each sex less attractive to the other by Anglo American social engineers for roughly a century, though the pace and intensity of this business of mindfucking has definitely picked up in the last 20 years or so.

Making a long story short social engineers, no doubt serving their evil, sociopathic masters in the elite ruling class used Freudian psychology (particularly his penis envy theory, which explains why feminists try to emulate men rather than their happier, more fertile and feminine grandmothers) to manipulate us into becoming perfect, socially atomized consumers. Women go off to work to try and be like men, wasting their decade of peak fertility chasing pointless credentials and feels. This makes women less attractive to men, who value femininity and fertility in women. Men, barraged by constant propaganda telling them masculinity is evil try to become more feminine.

Both behaviors drive each sex away from the other. People who are socially atomized are easier to manipulate and control. Unspeakable evil, homegrown in the USA. This system worked and it worked damn well until the Internet came along and broke up the centralized communication model the propaganda machine depended on.

Freud’s nephew Edward Bernays is the father of the propaganda model all media and advertising have used for a century, and he frequently used the penis envy theory to manipulate women. (Search Edward Bernays here on TNMM to find the relevant history, as some of these ideas have been discussed before.) Bernays’ first successful campaign was for Philip Morris, aimed at getting women to start smoking. The entire campaign was based on Freud’s penis envy theory. Bernays then went on to work for the U.S. government.

Today, Clotaire Rapaille who designs ads for most of the Fortune 100 companies uses methods Bernays pioneered. The propaganda (not just penis envy, but now constant and invented security threats meant to trick people into giving up their freedoms one by one) is meant to appeal to the hindbrain rather than the forebrain – which explains the invented, farcical emotional appeals liberals now use to manipulate millions via the corporate and Deep State controlled fake news media. It also explains why women pat male feminists on the head but never get hot and bothered by them.

Unfortunately, people are so gullible when this brainwashing is dressed up with clever slogans like “female empowerment” they scurry off and proceed to destroy their SMV without a wit as to what’s been done to them.

This sort of social engineering has become so advanced and so cleverly disguised it poses a serious threat to the survival of not only our nation but the human species itself. What are the ultimate aims of social engineers? To eliminate sex altogether and grow custom designed, genetically engineered human beings in pods? That’s a serious question. Because anyone paying attention knows they’re doing everything they can to destroy sexual attraction.

The Coming 80 IQ “Precariat” Slave Underclass

The admixture of poor genetics and the subsidization and subsequent rise of poor genetics with the genetic quality of the de facto ruling class remaining the same will mean the rise of a precariat, ~80 IQ underclass ruled over by a ruling class about 30-40 IQ points (Ashkenazi Jewish IQ) above the average 80 IQ person — if the threat of eminent genetic & amplified social stratification doesn’t sound problematic, I don’t know what does — especially when it is well documented in scientific literature that genetics largely define us characteristically; and, on the macroscopic level, the characteristics of distinct nations of peoples — nearly every reliably measured psychological trait, especially IQ, is significantly influenced by genetic factors.

To look at at on an individual basis is too short-sighted, it’s like saying “let’s allow the third world to flood into Europe and assess them all as individuals” — ah, by which time the vast bulk of the deviant swathes have established themselves as parasites and run rampant. It’s impractical to be too liberal on matters like this; a meritocratic, and most importantly pragmatic immigration policy is needed, a migrant comes to work, they have a purpose here, they are assessed on their qualifications and due placement in wider society — to accept a large group from a region known for its poor genetics and third world tendencies and to hope to assess them all as “individuals” is a pipe dream.

There must be compromise, sometimes absolute acts are necessary to solve partial issues.

Today’s open-door migrant policy-makers know very well that most of the third world migrants won’t be employed, will disproportionately commit the most crime, will disproportionately be welfare claimants; the statistics prove it (e.g. all available studies find that non-European immigrants to Britain cost about $10 billion/year).

Thus the authorities duck away when asked to list the background of migrant criminals, the media preaches how it is “irrelevant” to question the demographics behind society’s major negative trends.

Mass migration is not about economics, or even assisting an ageing Europe (pro-natal policies can easily amend that) this is about replacement, nothing less — the installment of an uncouth, dysgenic rabble that is more easily ruled over, the New World Order wants boots on the ground, a large impoverished workforce that will fall in line — third world African and Arab migrants offer this.

The imposition of the third world (generally poorer genes) on the first world (generally better genes) by force, under the cover of a hard-fought establishment propaganda campaign claiming “integration” and “assimilation” can happen between racial groups of greatly differing intelligence (it can’t, by the way) — combined with the safety net of welfare guarantees, means the proliferation of bad genetics — I predict this will soon mean the average person’s IQ will be 20 IQ points lower than it currently is in the Western world within the next century.

Nature naturally classifies itself implicitly; nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities — elite-funded social justice is attempting to bury this truth; that inequality is inherent in nature and is inevitable whether we like it or not — those in power know this, their social campaigns have had us forget that “equality” is a farce, only they benefit from “equality” — allowing different incompatible groups equal say is asking for tribalism to take hold, making it easy for picking apart with sensationalist rhetoric and demagoguery in the democratic process, diversity is balkanisation of the electorate with the media pitching the groups against one another, rich versus poor, black versus white, man versus woman — any modicum of reason is lost in the process.

They claim the African is just “oppressed”, never given his chance to shine — they blame the white man for oppressing the other races, when it was just nature taking its course. The strong, naturally, found their way to dominance — the weak faded away, or took on a lesser role.

“The earth continues to go round, whether it’s the man who kills the tiger or the tiger who eats the man. The stronger asserts his will, it’s the law of nature.” — Adolf Hitler

It harms the best of us, and emboldens the weakest; forced “equality” is forced redistribution, a way of keeping a homogeneous underclass, and its overlords’ positions, intact — because of this, it comes down to how we can best practically mitigate inequality in nature in a sensible way — a comprehensive eugenics program should be important in ensuring the biological stratification of humans doesn’t become yet more divergent and yet more damaging to collective human freedoms, civility, and intelligence — any given society is the average of its individuals, do we want to pursue a Western world populated by below average individuals (who are allowed to vote, by the way). Is it wise to degrade the average individual? I don’t think so.

Our negligent allowance of the mass importation and subsidization of poor genetics while knowing that these people know nothing of freedoms, nothing of human rights, nothing of free press, basic liberties and so on (they don’t seem to value them, either) — and, they are living apart from those who could influence them positively; their ignorance is being preserved and legitimized, they pass on nothing of value to the new generations that will follow; the third world social bubble ensues.

How will it vote? How will it shape the West? Will it stand firm in individuality, or cave to crony collectivism? I think most of us can see the collision course in motion.

How is the new ~80 IQ model citizen created?

80 IQ point average is an optimistic number.

To find the new average IQ, just draw up the average recorded scores of the major ethnic groups arriving in the current “migrant crisis” P.S. it’s called a “migrant crisis” to hide the fact it is completely orchestrated.

The newly introduced groups will settle and proliferate faster than native Caucasian populations and rise to demographic prominence.

Conversely, native Caucasians will either engage in miscegenation, or dwindle due to the falling white birthrate, compounded by organised social and toxicological affronts to white fertility.

Let’s look at this graph; the major countries of migrant origin include Syria, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Albania, Iraq, Eritrea, Serbia, Pakistan, Ukraine, Nigeria, Somalia, Russia, Macedonia, Gambia, Iran, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Senegal.

The non inter-European migrants are mostly Arabian and African in origin, both of these regions have a combined average biological IQ in the 70-80 region, as a previous article outlined; that’s barely functional in society, literally baseline functionality.

Some of the most oppressive and thoroughly corrupt regimes have been in countries of races maladjusted to holding such power to account.

  • Look to China with its one-party system with elections now recently discontinued, the people live as slaves, subjected to extreme censorship laws and a brutal regime that will not hesitate to crush dissenters.
  • Look to the nations of Africa, military dictatorships that have no civil order whatsoever; it’s pretty much always been that way.
  • South America is the same story, drug lords rule here, imperial Western interests hold big sway in agreement with the cartels.
  • And so on…

In the West — there is corruption, I’m not denying it.

But it is largely held at bay by an inquisitive, constitutionally switched-on populace, the West is more free than anywhere else for that reason alone — why else is it the premier global migrant destination? Because the people have defended their rights to property, to free speech, to self-determination — albeit not their banking systems and many areas and decisions of their government.

It’s the last holdout of liberty and true individual prosperity in the world.


Causes of national differences? (Mostly) genes.

Sources: refer to this webpage.

  • Since the 20th century, there have been worldwide continual increases in measured IQ. This rise has been correlated with degrees of rising education levels, and as such may provide a partial explanation for observed differences in average IQ scores between nations. One recent study suggests that the Flynn effect has ended in some developed nations such as Denmark and Norway, and suggests that this is due to immigration from countries with lower education levels or due to changes in education policies within the countries. Wicherts et al. have suggested that national differences in IQ could be because African countries have not yet experienced the improvements that cause the Flynn effect in the developed world, such as improvements in nutrition and health, and educational attainment.
  • Kanazawa writes that cold climate and harsh winters (the study uses mean annual temperature) as well as environment novelty (the study uses three different measures of distance from the ancestral environment in sub-Saharan Africa: ordinary distance and differences in latitudes and longitudes) have been proposed as important factors behind the genetic evolution of human intelligence. The study found independent support for both theories and argues that they together explain half to two-thirds of variance in national IQ. This study has been criticized by Wicherts et al. (2012) for multiple alleged flaws, including assuming that the Earth is flat, and that humans migrated in the most direct possible route, even if that route involved crossing the ocean. They conclude that these flaws “…should have precluded publication of the paper as constituted at the time of review.”
  • The sub-Saharan African IQ estimated from TIMSS studies from 72.4 to 65.9, rounded to 66.
  • The present research found that the Muslim country mean IQ of 81 is half a standard deviation below the mean IQ of non-Muslim nations and is not related to strength of Muslim culture as defined by the percentage of Muslims in the country. The mean IQ of 84 in Arab countries is not associated with per capita income and is incompatible with the intellectual achievements of the golden age of the Muslim Empire. Possible explanations for this decline include hybridization with sub-Saharan Africans, dysgenic decrease in the more educated Muslims employing birth control as suggested by Meisenberg, the Muslim religion not fostering critical thinking, and the intellectual contributions being both exaggerated and made by non-Muslims.
  • Wicherts, Borsboom, and Dolan (2010) criticized this and some other evolutionary studies for problems such as ignoring or assuming that the Flynn effect is equal worldwide and assuming that there have been no migrations and changes in climate over the course of evolution. “In addition, we show that national IQs are strongly confounded with the current developmental status of countries. National IQs correlate with all the variables that have been suggested to have caused the Flynn Effect in the developed world.”
  • Eppig, Fincher, and Thornhill (2010) states that distance from Africa, temperature, and most importantly by a large margin, prevalence of infectious disease predict national IQs. Education, literacy, GDP, and nutrition were not important as independent factors (however, the prevalence of infectious diseases is likely greatly affected by these factors). The authors argue that “From an energetics standpoint, a developing human will have difficulty building a brain and fighting off infectious diseases at the same time, as both are very metabolically costly tasks” and that “the Flynn effect may be caused in part by the decrease in the intensity of infectious diseases as nations develop.”
  • Becker and Rindermann (2016) found a moderate correlation between genetic distances, particularly with respect to geographic latitude, and cross-national IQ differences, even when controlled for factors such as Human Development Index, indicating an evolutionary explanation. Woodley of Menie et al. (2016) found that the frequencies of eight SNPs predictive of IQ correlated negatively with national fertility, and furthermore that the SNP meta-gene negatively predicts national fertility when HDI is controlled, “suggesting the existence of a selection pressure” that may reduce global g by 0.253 points per decade.

Ultimately a slave underclass forming the bulk of voters will mean liberties being chipped away faster, wage and living standards dropping big time, and an overall regression into the serfdom seen in previous eras.

The crucial voices of the reasonable will be drowned out. Full-on mob rule will take hold — the prospects for a continued orderly and rational civilization will die with the emergence of this mutating mob as it sinks its talons into the very things that uphold Western civilization; not realizing that in myopically seizing these things, it will come to destroy them too. When you come from a place of barbarism, you grab at what you can and hold tight, you don’t think about the wider picture, especially with bad genetics it makes things yet harder.